Written source · English

The Tarikh-i-Rashidi: a Moghul prince's history of Central Asia

Mirza Haidar Dughlat's Persian history of the Mongol (Moghul) khans of eastern Central Asia, written about 1546.

Full title The Tarikh-i-Rashidi

Mirza Muhammad Haidar Dughlat

Read the 12 passagesOpen the original book

Mirza Muhammad Haidar Dughlat (1499 or 1500 to 1551), a cousin of the emperor Babur, belonged to the noble Dughlat clan of the Moghuls, the descendants of Chagatai's Mongols in the Tian Shan and the Tarim basin. He wrote this history in Persian while ruling Kashmir, mixing older written chronicles, family traditions and his own memories of Kashgar, Yarkand and Moghulistan. This corpus copy is the 1895 English version, translated by E. Denison Ross and edited by Ney Elias, whose long introduction and notes discuss the names Moghul, Turk and Tatar and compare the text with later travellers.

How they knew
Part eyewitness
Who “Tartar” means here
Mirza Haidar himself speaks of 'Moghuls', the Mongol tribes of Moghulistan who had become Muslims. 'Tatar' and 'Tartar' appear mainly in the editor's introduction and notes, which quote Rashid al-Din and others on how the name Tatar spread to all the Mongols and nomads of inner Asia.
Why read it
A rare view from inside the Mongol world: how nomad khans felt about towns, how they became Muslims, what they built, and local stories of cities swallowed by desert sand.
Watch out
Keep Mirza Haidar's text apart from Ney Elias's introduction and footnotes, which are nineteenth-century commentary. Much of the early history is family tradition or copied from Timurid chronicles, and the translation of some passages was adjusted to make sense.

What it says: 12 passages

CitiesMoghulistan (Semirechye)first half of the 14th century

Turkistan after the Tatars: nothing but ruins

Editorial contextThe editor quotes the fourteenth-century Arab geographer Shihab al-Din (al-Umari), who was told by a traveller that the land had been ruined 'by the arms of the Tatars'. From a distance a village looks well built, but up close its houses are empty, and the people are now all herders. Elias adds that the towns had been built by earlier settled peoples such as the Uighurs and Kara-Khitai, before the Mongol nomads made it their home.

Since the region has been devastated by the arms of the Tatars," he writes, "it is inhabited only by a scanty population. According to what I have been assured by a man who has travelled through the country, there is nothing to be seen in Turkistan but ruins, and more or less obliterated remains.

Shihab al-Din (al-Umari), Masalik al-Absar, quoted in Ney Elias's introduction (1895)

About Tatars (Mongols) and the nomads who followed them

Keep in mind

Hearsay at two removes, quoted from Quatremère's French translation.

CitiesAksuabout 1468

A khan who loved towns, and chiefs who would not stay

Editorial contextMirza Haidar explains why his grandfather Yunus Khan kept leaving Kashgar and Aksu: the Khan liked cities and houses, but his amirs and soldiers refused to live in towns, so he had to follow them back to the steppe. It is a clear statement from inside a Mongol dynasty of the nomads' dislike of town life.

The substance of the whole matter is that the Khan was very fond of cities and houses, but the Amirs and soldiers of Moghulistan always avoided the towns, and for this reason the Khan spent most of his time in Moghulistan.

Mirza Haidar Dughlat (translated by E. Denison Ross, 1895)

About Moghuls (Muslim Mongols of Moghulistan) under Yunus Khan

Keep in mind

Mirza Haidar says the accounts he heard of these events differed.

Hunters glimpse castles and minarets under the sand

Editorial contextDescribing the deserts east and south of Kashgar and Khotan, Mirza Haidar says great towns once stood there, of which only the names Lob and Katak survive. Hunters of wild camels told of seeing foundations, castles, minarets, mosques and colleges that vanished under the sand again soon after. He does not say who built them.

In ancient times there were large towns in these [wastes] … all are buried under the sand. Hunters, who go there after wild camels, relate that sometimes the foundations of cities are visible, and that they have recognised noble buildings such as castles, minarets, mosques and colleges, but that when they returned a short time afterwards, no trace of these was to be found

Mirza Haidar Dughlat (translated by E. Denison Ross, 1895)

About Unknown former townspeople of the Tarim basin

Keep in mind

Hunters' reports; the buildings named (minarets, mosques, colleges) are Islamic types, so these towns were not prehistoric in Mirza Haidar's mind.

Tash Rabat: a Moghul khan's stone caravanserai

Editorial contextMirza Haidar credits Muhammad Khan, the khan who pushed the Moghuls into Islam, with building a rabat (travellers' lodge) of huge stones north of the Chadir Kul pass, with a tall entrance hall, a dome, cells and a mosque. He had seen it himself. The editor's note matches it with the ruin now called Tash Rabat and rejects a later claim that it was a converted Hindu temple, since no manuscript says so.

In the construction of this building he employed stones of great size, the like of which are only to be seen in the temples … of Kashmir. The Rabat contains an entrance hall 20 gaz in height. … The whole building is of stone, and over the doors there are huge solid blocks of stone, which I thought very wonderful, before I had seen the temples in Kashmir.

Mirza Haidar Dughlat (translated by E. Denison Ross, 1895)

About Muhammad Khan of the Moghuls

Keep in mind

The editor's note weighs the identification with the surviving ruin and rejects a later story that it was a converted Hindu temple.

Show 8 more passages
BuildingsYarkandlate 15th century

Yarkand's new citadel and the old town dug up for treasure

Editorial contextMirza Haidar describes how Aba Bakr made Yarkand his capital: he dug out the old town, finding much treasure, brought in water channels, laid out gardens and built a citadel thirty gaz high with six gateways guarded by paired towers. It is a local ruler's building programme described by a man who knew the city well.

The old town was dug out by Mirza Aba Bakr ; it was among the excavations [kazihka] which we have spoken about, and much treasure was found [in it]. … Mirza Aba Bakr built a citadel which, in most places, is thirty statute gaz in height.

Mirza Haidar Dughlat (translated by E. Denison Ross, 1895)

About Mirza Aba Bakr, Dughlat ruler of Kashgar

Keep in mind

Mirza Haidar himself doubts the report of 12,000 gardens.

Daily lifeMoghulistanlate 15th century

No true Muslims until they settle in towns

Editorial contextAt the start of Yunus Khan's reign, the Moghuls still lived in the old way, shunning towns and farmland, and were Muslims in name only; neighbours even sold them as slaves like unbelievers. Yunus decided that they would never be good Muslims until they settled, and led them to Tashkent, though some rebelled and stayed on the steppe. Elsewhere (p. 58) Mirza Haidar records that an earlier khan had a horseshoe nail driven into the head of any Moghul who refused to wear a turban.

At the beginning of the reign of Yunus Khan, all the Moghuls dwelt, according to their old custom, in Moghulistan ; they avoided all towns and cultivated countries [and regarded them] with great repugnance. They were Musulmans in nothing but the name

Mirza Haidar Dughlat (translated by E. Denison Ross, 1895)

About Moghuls under Yunus Khan

Daily lifeAksuabout 1350s (as told)

Better than a dog? A khan's conversion to Islam

Editorial contextThe young Moghul khan, feeding his dogs pork during a hunt, asks a captured Persian-speaking holy man whether he is better than the dog. The shaikh answers that with faith he is better, without it the dog is. Moved, the khan promises to become a Muslim when he rules, and years later the shaikh's son holds him to it. Mirza Haidar heard it from the holy man's descendants.

He was, at that time, feeding some dogs with swine's flesh, and he asked the Shaikh angrily : "Are you better than this dog, or is the dog better than you ?" The Shaikh replied : "If I have faith I am better than this dog ; but if I have no faith, this dog is better than I am."

Mirza Haidar Dughlat (translated by E. Denison Ross, 1895)

About Tughluk Timur Khan of the Moghuls

Keep in mind

Family and religious tradition, told about two centuries after the event.

The first kumiss of spring, and a cup that fell

Editorial contextMirza Haidar's father told him of a spring feast held, by old Moghul custom, when the new kumiss (fermented mare's milk) came in. Just as the amir offered the khan a cup, news came of an envoy from Timur demanding tribute, and the cup fell from the khan's hands. The amir consoled him with verses about not grieving over tomorrow.

I have frequently heard my father (upon whom rest the mercy of God) relate that in the beginning of the spring the new kimiz had come in, and on that day, according to an ancient Moghul custom, a great feast had been prepared.

Mirza Haidar Dughlat (translated by E. Denison Ross, 1895)

About Moghuls under Khizir Khwaja Khan

The nameCentral Asiaearly 14th century

Why the Mongols are still called Tatars

Editorial contextNey Elias's introduction quotes the Persian historian Rashid al-Din (writing about 1300 to 1310). The Tatars were once so powerful that other Turkic peoples called themselves Tatars for the prestige, just as in Rashid's own day everyone wanted to be a 'Mongol'. That, he says, is why the Mongols are still called Tatars in China, India, the Kipchak steppe, Arabia, Syria and Egypt.

Previous to this period it was the same with the Tatars, on account of their power, and this is the reason why the Mongols are still called Tatars in China and in India, by the Kirghiz, the Bashgirds, in the Kapchak country, in the north of Asia, in Arabia, in Syria, in Egypt, and in Africa.

Rashid al-Din, quoted (via d'Ohsson's French) in Ney Elias's introduction (1895)

About Tatars and Mongols

Keep in mind

Editorial introduction quoting a fourteenth-century source at second hand.

The nameMargilanlate 15th century

A Moghul khan with a full beard and a Tajik face

Editorial contextA Muslim scholar expected Yunus Khan, as a 'Moghul', to be a beardless desert Turk, and was surprised to find an elegant man with a full beard and a Persian-looking (Tajik) face. The editor uses the story to show how far the ruling Moghul families had mixed with their Turkic and Persian neighbours.

I had heard that Yunus Khan was a Moghul, and I concluded that he was a beardless man, with the ways and manners of any other Turk of the desert. But when I saw him, I found he was a person of elegant deportment, with a full beard and a Tajik face

Maulana Muhammad Kazi, as reported by Mirza Haidar Dughlat (translated by E. Denison Ross, 1895)

About Yunus Khan of the Moghuls

Keep in mind

The editor's racial reading ('Aryan') belongs to his time, not to the source.

Strange talesLop Nur region14th century (as told)

The town of Katak, buried by a rain of sand

Editorial contextA holy man warns the town of Katak of God's wrath and leaves. The muezzin goes back for a last call to prayer, sees sand falling like dry snow, and finds the town buried up to the minaret, from which he jumps to escape. Mirza Haidar adds that winds sometimes uncover the minaret or a house where everything is in order but the owner is white bones. The editor notes that sand does not fall like snow but that dunes do bury towns.

So he again ascended and, looking round, discovered that it was raining sand, and to such a degree that the whole town was covered ; after a little while he noticed that the ground was rising, and at last only a part of the minaret was left free.

Mirza Haidar Dughlat, retelling a story from Maulana Khwaja Ahmad (translated by E. Denison Ross, 1895)

About Muslim townspeople of Katak in the Tarim basin

Keep in mind

A pious legend passed down in one family; the editor's note compares it with real sand-buried ruins seen by Forsyth, Bellew and Przhevalsky.

Eyes that could bore through brass: a captive poet's Tatars

Editorial contextElias quotes the Persian poet Amir Khusrau of Delhi, who had been a prisoner of Mongol raiders and describes them with hatred: narrow piercing eyes, faces set on necks, noses spreading from cheek to cheek. Elias warns that the poet was 'burning with dread and resentment' and omits 'offensive details'. On a later page Elias notes that Khusrau calls the same people Tatars, Turks and Moghuls.

There were more than a thousand Tatar infidels and warriors of other tribes, riding on camels, great commanders in battle, all with steel-like bodies clothed in cotton ; with faces like fire, with caps of sheepskin, with heads shorn. Their eyes were so narrow and piercing that they might have bored a hole in a brazen vessel

Amir Khusrau, quoted in Ney Elias's introduction (1895)

About Mongol ('Tatar') raiders of India

Keep in mind

Hostile caricature by a former captive, quoted in translation by the editor.

The fine print

How we know

mixed Part firsthand observation, part drawn from other sources.

Regional ruler / memoirist and historian

Research notes
  • 1895 Elias/Ross edition; distinguish remembered experience from earlier history. UW selections omit much political material.

Why it matters

A local account of eastern Chaghatay history, geography and communities.

Places named

Moghulistan; Kashgar; Central Asia; Kashmir

Keep exploring