Written source · English

A French officer's account of the Cossacks and the Crimean Tartars

A 1663 French description of Ukraine's Cossacks and the Tartars of Crimea, with a history of the Cossack wars against Poland, in a 1672 English translation.

Full title A Discourse of the … Cossacks, with Another of the Precopian Tartars

Pierre Chevalier; Edward Brown, translator

Read the 13 passagesOpen the original book

Pierre Chevalier, a French officer who (his English translator says) served as a commander and lived long in Poland, published this short book in French in 1663; Edward Brown's English version appeared in London in 1672. It has three parts: the Cossacks' country and customs, a 'Discourse of the Precopian Tartars' (the Crimean Tatars, named after their fortress town Perekop), and a history of Bohdan Khmelnytsky's Cossack revolt of 1648 to 1651, in which the Crimean Khan fought as the Cossacks' ally. The Tartar chapter mixes things Chevalier saw in Poland (Tartar prisoners, captives) with general descriptions of Crimea, its towns, raids and slave trade.

How they knew
Part eyewitness
Who “Tartar” means here
Mainly the Crimean Tatars ('Precopian Tartars') ruled by the Khan (Cham) of the Giray dynasty, a Muslim people and vassals of the Ottoman Sultan, plus the Nogai hordes of Budjak. Chevalier also uses 'Tartary' for all of northern Asia, divided into five parts.
Why read it
A compact seventeenth century portrait of the Crimean Khanate from the Polish side: its towns and houses, the Khan's court at Bakhchysarai, raiding and the Caffa slave market, food, arms and morals, and the Khan's army at the siege of Zbarazh.
Watch out
Chevalier writes as a soldier in the service of the Tartars' Polish enemies; some Tartar material overlaps with the engineer Beauplan's earlier description of Ukraine, which Chevalier names, so not every detail is his own observation. The 1672 print uses the long s and the OCR is rough.

What it says: 13 passages

Perekop, Crim and the Khan's court at Bakhchysarai

Editorial contextA quick census of the Khan's towns in Crimea, counted in houses: Perekop (which the Tartars called Or) had about 400, and Bakhchysarai, where the Khan kept his court, about 2,000. The same page names a Black Sea trading town of about 2,000 houses belonging to the Khan (the name is garbled in the scan; probably Kozlov, today's Yevpatoria), and the next page adds the Khan's second palace at Almasaray, with a town of only 60 to 80 houses.

The Towns of this Peninsula are first Przecop, called Or by the Tartars, where there are about four hundred Houses … Crim, another Town of the Cham … inhabited by few but by the Tartars. Baciasary where the Cham ordinarily keepeth his Court … about two thousand Houses.

Pierre Chevalier (translated by Edward Brown, 1672)

About Crimean Tatars

Keep in mind

House counts are estimates; Chevalier does not say he visited Crimea.

Caffa, a fallen Genoese trading city

Editorial contextCaffa (ancient Theodosia, modern Feodosia) belonged to the Turks, not the Khan. Chevalier describes it as a once-great Genoese trading port that had declined under Ottoman rule but still had five or six thousand houses and a mixed population, mostly Christian, with dozens of churches.

it was one of the most trading Towns of the Levant … yet there are still remaining about five or six thousand Houses; the Inhabitants are Greeks, Italians, the remainder of the Genoeses, Armenians, Jews, Turks and Tartars, but the most part of them are Christians

Pierre Chevalier (translated by Edward Brown, 1672)

About Crimean Tatars, Turks, Greeks, Armenians, Jews and Italians

The Khan's army at the siege of Zbarazh

Editorial contextIn the history section, Chevalier describes the Polish commander Firley fortifying the town and castle of Zbarazh (in today's western Ukraine) before a huge Tartar and Cossack army surrounded it. He compares the host to those of Attila and Tamerlane, and on the next page stresses that the Khan himself was present in person.

the Army of the Tartars and Cossacks came and encompassed them in on all sides in such numbers, that there have been seldom seen the like forces together, since those of Attila and Tamerlan

Pierre Chevalier (translated by Edward Brown, 1672)

About Crimean Tatars allied with Khmelnytsky's Cossacks

Keep in mind

A partisan Polish-side narrative of the siege; the numbers are rhetorical.

The scan is too rough to double-check this quote by machine. Compare it with the page.

No towns outside the peninsula

Editorial contextChevalier says Lesser Tartary stretched far beyond the Crimean peninsula across the steppe as far as the Don, but that outside the peninsula there were no towns or villages at all. The Tartars simply moved their camps to wherever the grazing was good; the next page says they used huts and 'travelling sheds' only in winter.

There are no Towns nor yet Villages, but in the Chersonesus, the rest being only incultivated Plains, yet of themselves very fruitful, and the Tartars encamp up and down in them as they find more or less forrage

Pierre Chevalier (translated by Edward Brown, 1672)

About Crimean Tatars and Nogais

Show 9 more passages

Captives sold at Caffa, as far as Persia and India

Editorial contextChevalier says Crimean Tartars left farming to Christians, Jews and their own slaves, and counted their wealth in horses, cattle and captives taken in raids. The captives were sold to merchants at Caffa and shipped east, and Polish women, he says, could end up in harems in Persia and India.

Their Horses and Cattel are their Riches, with the Booty and Slaves of both Sexes, which they take in their incursions and sell to the Merchants of Caffa … especially the Women and Maids of Poland, who are carried away sometimes as far as Persia and India, to furnish the Serraglios of those Countreys

Pierre Chevalier (translated by Edward Brown, 1672)

About Crimean Tatars

Keep in mind

Written from the Polish side of a long frontier war.

Horse meat cooked under the saddle

Editorial contextChevalier repeats the famous story that Tartars on the march softened horse meat by riding on it under the saddle and ate it with no sauce but the horse's sweat. He adds that they chose worn-out, sick or lame horses for this, not the best ones. At home they ate millet porridge and boiled horse meat.

when they goe to war and are upon their March, they make it ready, or rather mortify, or just heat it, under their Saddles, and eat it afterwards in this condition without any other sauce then the froth upon the Flesh, made by the sweating of the Horse

Pierre Chevalier (translated by Edward Brown, 1672)

About Crimean Tatars on campaign

Keep in mind

The saddle-meat story goes back to medieval writers and is a stock European image of steppe warriors; Chevalier does not say he saw it.

Water, millet beer and mare's milk

Editorial contextHere Chevalier speaks as an eyewitness: in Poland he saw Tartar prisoners carry dead horses out of stables to feast on. He then lists their drinks: water, snow in winter, horse broth, 'Breha' (a millet drink, the steppe boza), and for the better-off mare's milk, mead and spirits, even though Islam forbade them wine.

I have seen at my being in Poland, divers Tartar prisoners come and take away dead Horses out of the Stables to feast one another with … their drink is ordinarily clear water, and in winter snow … or else Breha, which is a drink made with boiled Millet, but those who are better accommodated, and more delicate, drink Mares milk, Mead, and Strong waters

Pierre Chevalier (translated by Edward Brown, 1672)

About Crimean Tatars (including prisoners in Poland)

Daily lifeWarsawabout 1650s

Tartar captives hauling brick and lime in Poland

Editorial contextSlavery ran both ways. Chevalier says the Poles kept most Tartar prisoners as chained slaves, used 'as Beasts' to carry building materials, firewood and other loads, living on bread and water. He saw two or three hundred of them in Warsaw, earning a little by making and selling whips.

the rest are kept as Slaves, having always Irons upon their feet, and are made use of as Beasts to carry all manner of burthens, Lime, Brick, and all other materials for building … when I was at Warsaw, I had opportunity to take notice of two or three hundred of them

Pierre Chevalier (translated by Edward Brown, 1672)

About Crimean Tatar prisoners of war

Sheepskins, bows and whips no European could copy

Editorial contextThe Tartars living out on the steppe wore sheepskins and sheepskin caps and carried a scimitar, bow and about twenty arrows, all homemade from horse parts. Chevalier admires their plaited whips, which he says French and German saddlers could not imitate, and notes they were beginning to use firearms.

The Tartars who live abroad, are habited in Sheep-skins with a Cap of the same Stuffe; their Arms are ordinarily a Cimeter, a Bow and a Quiver, with about twenty Arrows … of which also they make their Whips so neatly, by a particular Art which they have, that our Sadlers in France and Germany have not yet been able to imitate them

Pierre Chevalier (translated by Edward Brown, 1672)

About Crimean Tatars (the steppe-dwelling ones)

Honest at home, raiders abroad

Editorial contextAn enemy's surprisingly warm verdict: Chevalier calls the Tartars among the least vicious of nations, chaste, sincere and faithful, with no thieves or false witnesses among themselves. He explains their raids on Christian lands by saying they did not regard robbing 'infidels' as wrong. On the next page he says Polish nobles trusted young Tartar servants with the keys to their money and jewels.

As to their Morals, there are very few Nations to be found less vitious, for besides their continence, they are extremely sincere, and faithful, they have no Thieves or false witnesses amongst them, little injustice or violence, and live in Union and great tranquility

Pierre Chevalier (translated by Edward Brown, 1672)

About Crimean Tatars

Keep in mind

A generalisation; on the next page Chevalier adds his own observation that Polish nobles trusted young Tartar servants with their money and jewels.

Five Tartaries on the map

Editorial contextHere 'Tartary' is a geographer's label for most of northern Asia, carved into five parts: Crim Tartary, the hordes under the Tsar (including Kazan and Astrakhan), Zagatay or the Uzbek country where Tamerlane reigned, Cathay or Great Tartary, and an unknown far north-east. It shows how loosely the name was spread over many peoples.

Tartary is devided into five parts, the first is the lesser Tartary, or Tartary of Precop, called also Crim Tartary. The second is Sarmatia Asiatica, which containeth many Hordes of the Tartars subject to the Great Duke of Moscovia, as the Czeremisses, the Nagais, Zauolhans, and those of Cazan and Astracan.

Pierre Chevalier (translated by Edward Brown, 1672)

About Crimean Tatars, Volga Tatars, Nogais, Uzbeks and the peoples of 'Great Tartary'

Keep in mind

A textbook geographic scheme, not observation. The list continues on p.35 with Zagatay (where Tamerlane reigned), Cathay or Great Tartary, and an unknown north-east.

Scythians under a new name

Editorial contextChevalier opens his Tartar chapter by saying the name 'Tartar' was only about four hundred years old and that the people were really the ancient Scythians under a new label. He reports the scholar Leunclavius's view that the name came from a 'River Tartar' in their homeland.

The Tartars have not been known by this name, but for about four hundred years, and are properly the Scythians; some Authors, as Leunclave and others, derive this name from the River Tartar, in the Countrey where they did inhabit

Pierre Chevalier (translated by Edward Brown, 1672)

About Tartars in general, including the Crimean Tatars

Keep in mind

The river etymology is reported from earlier authors, not Chevalier's own finding.

Were the Tartars the Lost Ten Tribes?

Editorial contextChevalier repeats a learned theory that 'Tartar' was a corruption of 'Tatares', supposedly a Syriac word for 'remnant', making the Tartars the remnant of the Ten Tribes of Israel carried off by the Assyrians. He presents it as what 'some say', not as his own view.

There are some who say that the name of Tartar is improper and corrupted, and that they ought to be called Tatares or Totares, A word which in the Syriack Language signifies a Remnant, supposing that these people are the remnant of the Ten Tribes which Salmanazar and his predecessors led away captive into Assyria

Pierre Chevalier (translated by Edward Brown, 1672)

About Tartars in general

Keep in mind

A scholarly speculation of the period, reported secondhand.

The fine print

How we know

official or contemporary record An official document or a record made at the time.

Contemporary regional description

Research notes
  • Determine personal observation versus borrowed description in each section.

Why it matters

Peoples, religion, government and western Tartary terminology.

Places named

Crimea; Pontic steppe; Cossack lands

Keep exploring