Place · canal

Grand Canal

What the sources say here: 2 passages

Milk at court, in memory of Tartar origins

Editorial contextAsking about the 'milk-tea' that was to have been served at the cancelled audience, Ellis learns it is simply milk, served to recall the Manchu dynasty's Tartar origins; likewise the emperor carves meat with a knife rather than chopsticks at state meals. Ellis adds that the conquerors profess to value their ancestors' simple ways but have lost their energy.

This milk-tea, it appears, is simply milk; chaya, or tea, being affixed to the names of many beverages besides that made from the tea plant. The milk is given as a record of the Tartar origin of the reigning family. Another instance of the anxiety to preserve these recollections is, that the Emperor, on state occasions, uses a knife to divide his meat, instead of chop-sticks.

Henry Ellis

About Manchus (Qing imperial family)

Continue in this sourceHenry Ellis's journal of the Amherst embassy to China1816 · 9 passages

The Grand Canal: a Mongol work, or only a Mongol repair?

Editorial contextBarrow credits the successors of Genghis Khan with opening a waterway joining the two ends of the empire, praising it as the highest credit to the Mongol Tartars. He records the Chinese counter-claim that the Tartars only repaired older works. Elsewhere he says Kublai 'repaired' the canal.

the successors of Gengis-Khan were induced to open a direct communication between the two extremes of the empire, by means of the rivers and canals; an undertaking that reflects the highest credit on the Mongul Tartars, and which cannot fail to be regarded with admiration, as long as it shall continue to exist. The Chinese, however, say, that the Tartars only repaired the old works that were fallen into decay.

John Barrow

About Mongols (Yuan dynasty); Chinese

Continue in this sourceJohn Barrow's Travels in China1792 to 1794 · 12 passages

1 source and maps name this place

  1. 1797exact year