Written source · German

Schlözer's history of Lithuania (Northern History, part two)

A Göttingen historian's critical history of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania to 1569, full of wars and alliances with the Tatars, 1785.

Full title General Northern History, from the newest and best northern writers and own investigations, as a geographical and historical introduction to a correct knowledge of all Scandinavian, Finnish, Slavic, Lettish and Siberian peoples (Halle 1771; copy dated 1785 in catalogue)

August Ludwig Schlözer

Read the 4 passagesOpen the original book

August Ludwig Schlözer (1735-1809), the Göttingen historian of Russia, wrote a General Northern History for the German Allgemeine Welthistorie; its first part appeared at Halle in 1771. This corpus copy, catalogued under that title and dated 1785, is in fact the second part: Geschichte von Littauen, Kurland und Liefland, by Schlözer and Ludwig Albrecht Gebhardi (Halle, Gebauer, 1785). Schlözer's section retells Lithuanian history to 1569, mainly from the chroniclers Stryjkowski and Kojałowicz, with sharp critical footnotes; Gebhardi covers Livonia. Tatars appear constantly as raiders, hired troops, allies and exiles, and an appendix annotates what the Byzantine historian Laonikos Chalkokondyles wrote about them.

How they knew
Compiled from others
Who “Tartar” means here
The Golden Horde and its successor khanates: the Kipchak or Great Horde on the Volga, the Crimean (Perekop) Tatars, Kazan and Astrakhan Tatars, Nogais, Tatars settled in Lithuania, and the Dobruja Tatars. In his notes Schlözer also discusses Mongols versus Tatars and the Byzantine habit of calling Tatars Scythians.
Why read it
A sober Enlightenment historian treats the Tatars as ordinary political players (enemies one year, sworn allies the next), and his footnotes explain words such as Horde and Scythian.
Watch out
This is not the 1771 General Northern History described on the catalogue card but its 1785 continuation on Lithuania and Livonia. The narrative follows 16th and 17th century Polish-Lithuanian chroniclers and inherits their dates.

What it says: 4 passages

CitiesGolden Horde, lower Volga13th to 15th centuries (note of 1785)

What ‘the Horde’ meant

Editorial contextSchlözer explains that orda, from which the German word Horde was corrupted, is Turkish and Tatar ordu: first a field camp, then the sutlers' quarter of the camp and everyone who trailed after the army. Because the Mongols and Tatars of Kipchak long stayed nomads and warriors, Russian annals added a third meaning: the headquarters of the khan to whom the Russians paid tribute. ‘Going to the Horde’ meant appearing before the overlord as supplicant, vassal or litigant, just as Greek princes after 1453 went ‘to the Porte’ of the sultan.

Because the Mongols and Tatars in Kipchak long remained nomads and mere warriors, a third meaning arose in the Russian annals, by which Orda denoted the headquarters of the Tatar commander, namely the one under whose yoke the Russians stood. To go to the Horde now meant to appear before the supreme ruler as a supplicant, as a vassal, as a defendant or as an accuser.

Working translation

Original wording

Weil nun die Mogolen und Tataren in Kaptschak lange Zeit Nomaden und blosse Krieger blieben: so kam in den rußischen Annalen eine IIIte Bedeutung auf, nach der Orda das Hauptquartier des tatarischen Heerführers, und zwar desjenigen, unter dessen Joche die Russen stunden, bezeichnete. In die Orde gehen, hieß nun so viel, als wie Supplicant, wie Vasall, wie Beklagter, oder wie Ankläger, vor dem Ober Regenten erscheinen.

August Ludwig Schlözer (1785), footnote

About Mongols and Tatars of the Kipchak khanate

An oath sworn on drawn daggers

Editorial contextWhen envoys of Khan Sachmat (Sheikh Ahmed of the Great Horde) concluded an alliance against Moscow with Polish and Lithuanian lords at Kraków, the Tatars sealed it their own way. They poured cold water over drawn daggers and, one after another, sipped it as it dripped from the points, cursing whoever first broke the treaty to vanish like that water. In a footnote Schlözer remarks drily that this Christian alliance with Tatars came decades before the French scandalised Europe by allying with the Ottomans.

whereby the Tatars, after the custom of their country, poured cold water on drawn daggers and, as it dripped from the point, sipped it one after another, with the curse that whoever first broke the alliance should pass away like this water.

Working translation

Original wording

wobey die Tataren, nach ihrer Landessitte, auf gezückte Dolche kaltes Wasser gossen, und solches, so wie es von der Spitze herabträufelte, einer nach dem andern schlürften, mit dem Fluche, daß wer den Bund zuerst bräche, wie dieses Wasser vergehen solle.

August Ludwig Schlözer (1785), following Polish-Lithuanian chroniclers

About Kipchak (Great Horde) Tatars of Khan Sheikh Ahmed (Sachmat)

The namePontic steppe and Moldavialater 1400s (Chalkokondyles), annotated 1785

Were the Tatars Herodotus's Scythians?

Editorial contextIn an appendix Schlözer prints what the Athenian historian Laonikos Chalkokondyles, writing in the later 1400s, said about the north. Like other learned Byzantines he gave new peoples old classical names and called the Tatars Scythians. Schlözer points out the result: taking them for Herodotus's Scythians of Moldavia, Chalkokondyles had them migrate from Europe into Asia instead of the other way round. He adds that the Polish writer Miechowita mocked this error and distinguished four kinds of Tatars: Chagatai east of the Caspian, the Kipchak Horde between the Don and the Yaik, the Crimeans, and the Lithuanian Tatars.

The good Chalkokondyles really seems to take the Tatars of his time, who lived from the Danube to the Altai under several Mongol rulers, for the Scythians of Herodotus in Moldavia: consequently they must of course have migrated from Europe to Asia, not the other way round!

Working translation

Original wording

Der gute Chalkokandyles scheint wirklich die Tataren seiner Zeit, die von der Donau an bis zum Altaj hin unter mehreren mogolischen Beherrschern lebten, für die Scythen des Herodots in der Moldau zu halten: folglich mußten sie freilich aus Europa nach Asien, nicht umgekehrt, gewandert seyn!

August Ludwig Schlözer (1785), footnote on Laonikos Chalkokondyles

About Tatars of the Golden Horde and its successors

The namePodolia and Dobruja1331 in the source

Where the Dobruja Tatars came from

Editorial contextSchlözer tells how the Tatars, after wasting Russia, had settled on the steppe on both sides of the Dnieper and ruled Podolia through their baskaks (governors), until Grand Duke Olgerd of Lithuania beat three Tatar khans at Siniawoda (the Blue Waters) and cleared them from the land as far as Ochakiv. The survivors, he says, settled on the Dobruja plains by the Danube, where their descendants still remembered that the Lithuanians had driven their ancestors out of Podolia. Olgerd's nephews then built castles in the freed land.

Those who escaped the sword then settled on the Dobruja plains on the Danube, where their descendants … still know that their forefathers were driven out of Podolia by the Lithuanians.

Working translation

Original wording

Die dem Schwerdt entflohen, ließen sich hierauf in den Dobruczer Ebenen an der Donau nieder, wo ihre Nachkommen … auch noch wissen, daß ihre Vorfahren durch die Littauer aus Podolien vertrieben worden.

August Ludwig Schlözer (1785), following Kojałowicz

About Golden Horde Tatars of Podolia; the Dobruja Tatars

Keep in mind

Schlözer keeps his chronicle source's date of 1331; the battle of the Blue Waters is now usually dated 1362. The Dobruja tradition is reported, not checked.

The fine print

How we know

compilation Assembled from earlier sources. The author did not observe it directly.

compilation of earlier sources (Strahlenberg, Müller, Fischer, Herberstein, Russian chronicles) with critical discussion; no firsthand travel

Research notes
  • Published as vol 31 of the Allgemeine Welthistorie continuation; catalogue date 1785 versus known first edition 1771, record both.

Why it matters

The Göttingen synthesis that reorganized the peoples of the Russian north and Siberia by language family and explicitly attacked loose Tatar and Scythian genealogies; a benchmark for late-eighteenth-century German scholarly usage.

Places named

Northern Eurasia; Siberia; Volga; Ural

Peoples named

Named only as Tartars or Tatars
European peoples and powers
Early steppe and pre-Mongol peoples

Siberian peoples (Tatars, Samoyeds, Ostyaks, Voguls, Tunguses, Yakuts); Finns; Slavs; Scythians and Huns (historical discussion)

Keep exploring