The atlas of d'Anville's maps of China, Chinese Tartary and Tibet (1737), with a foreword on how the Jesuit survey was made and an eyewitness 'Relation of Bukharia'.
Full title Memoir of M. d’Anville, first geographer to the king, on China (defence of his China and Chinese Tartary maps and their sources, 1776; 47 pp.)
Jean-Baptiste Bourguignon d'Anville (1697-1782), the French king's geographer, drew the maps for du Halde's Description of China (1735) from the survey that Jesuit missionaries made for the Kangxi emperor between 1708 and 1717. The catalogue record is for d'Anville's 1776 memoir defending those maps, but the corpus copy under this record is the related Nouvel atlas de la Chine, de la Tartarie chinoise et du Thibet (1737), issued as a fifth, atlas volume to a quarto edition of du Halde. Its foreword explains which maps were measured and which compiled, and it prints an anonymous 'Relation de la Boucharie' by a writer who says he had been in Little Bukhara under Kalmyk rule.
How they knew
Compiled from others
Who “Tartar” means here
'Tartarie' is the map label for the lands north and west of China proper (Manchuria, Mongolia, Dzungaria). In the Relation, 'Tartares' are corrected to 'or rather the Kalmyks' who ruled Little Bukhara, and the Manchus are the 'Tartars' who conquered China.
Why read it
It shows how the standard 18th-century map of 'Chinese Tartary' was made, from Jesuit triangulation and Gerbillon's travel notes, and admits that the lands towards the Caspian were known only imperfectly. The Relation adds a rare eyewitness look at town life in Kashgaria.
Watch out
This is not the 1776 memoir named in the catalogue. The atlas OCR is poor, and the Relation de la Boucharie is anonymous and undated.
Bukhara, 'twice the size of Moscow', in Great Tartary
Editorial contextThe Relation opens by noting that geographers count Bukharia as part of Great Tartary, because 'the Tartars, or rather the Kalmyks' had invaded part of it; the author insists it is a separate state, just as China remained China under its Tartar conquerors. Great Bukharia has several towns, each with its own khan, of which Bukhara is said to be twice as large as Moscow.
Geographers usually regard Bukharia as part of Great Tartary. Indeed the Tartars, or rather the Kalmyks, have invaded part of it … There are several towns in Great Bukharia, and each has its own khan or regent. The chief ones are Bukhara, which is said to be twice as large as the city of Moscow in Russia
Working translation
Original wording
Les Géographes regardent ordinairement la Boucharie, comme faisant partie de la Grande Tartarie. En effet les Tartares, ou pour mieux dire les Calmuques, en ont envahi une partie … Il y a plusieurs Villes dans la Grande Boucharie, & elles ont chacune son Cham, ou Régent. Les principales sont: Bouchara, qu'on dit être deux fois plus grande que la ville de Moscou en Russie
Anonymous author of the 'Relation de la Boucharie' printed in the atlas
Stone houses and mud-brick ovens in Little Bukharia
Editorial contextThe anonymous author, who says he lived in Little Bukharia, describes its townspeople's houses as built of stone and fairly good, with few furnishings: no tables or chairs, only Chinese chests on which mattresses were laid. Slaves bought from the Kalmyks, Russians and others cooked in iron pots set into a hearth, and some houses had small ovens of clay or unbaked brick, like their walls.
The houses of the Bukharans are of stone and passably good. Their furniture is scanty and plain. They have neither tables nor chairs. … Some also have small ovens, which are made, like the rest of their walls, of clay or of unbaked bricks.
Working translation
Original wording
Les maisons des Bouchars sont de pierre, & passablement bonnes. Leurs meubles sont en petit nombre, & de peu d'ornement. Ils n'ont ni tables ni chaises. … Il y en a qui ont aussi de petits fours, qui se font, comme le reste de leurs murailles, de terre grasse ou de briques crues.
Anonymous author of the 'Relation de la Boucharie'
Editorial contextThe Relation describes the Bukharans' cure for sickness: a mullah reads from a book, blows on the patient several times and makes passes with a sharp knife around his face, believing this cuts the root of the illness, which they hold to be the Devil's work. The dead, it adds, are buried with a Koran on the chest in a pleasant grove fenced with a hedge or palisade.
When a Bukharan falls ill, this is the remedy he uses: a mullah reads him a passage from some book, blows on him several times, and with a well-sharpened knife makes various passes all round the sick man's face. They imagine that by this operation they cut the root of the illness, which they say is the work of the Devil.
Working translation
Original wording
Lorsqu'un Bouchar tombe malade, voici le remede dont il se sert; Un Mula lui lit un passage de quelque livre, souffle à plusieurs reprises sur lui, & d'un couteau bien aiguisé fait plusieurs gesticulations tout autour du visage du Malade. Ils s'imaginent que par cette opération ils coupent la racine de la maladie, qu'ils disent d'ailleurs être l'ouvrage du Diable.
Anonymous author of the 'Relation de la Boucharie'
Editorial contextThe atlas foreword, summarising du Halde, says the Jesuits' manuscript maps passed through d'Anville's hands before engraving. For the general map of Tartary he used the travel memoirs of Father Gerbillon checked against the sheet maps, and for the lands between Tibet, Tartary and the Caspian, where the missionaries had only imperfect information, he combined their notes with whatever else he could learn.
they passed through the hands of Mr d'Anville … who then made the general maps from them. For that of Tartary he used the memoirs of Father Gerbillon, comparing them with the particular maps … as the missionaries had some knowledge, though imperfect, of the countries lying between Tibet, Tartary and the Caspian Sea, Mr d'Anville made use of it
Working translation
Original wording
elles ont passé par celles de Mr. d'Anville … qui en a formé ensuite les Cartes générales. Il s'est servi pour celle de la Tartarie des Mémoires du Pere Gerbillon, en les comparant avec les Cartes particulières … comme les Missionaires avaient eu quelques connoissances, quoi qu'imparfaites des Pays situez entre le Thibet, la Tartarie & la Mer Caspienne, Mr. d'Anville en a fait usage
Foreword (Avertissement) of the 1737 atlas, summarising du Halde's preface
The foreword separates surveyed provinces from compiled areas; the far west of 'Tartary' on these maps rests on report and inference, not measurement.
The fine print
How we know
compilation Assembled from earlier sources. The author did not observe it directly.
compilation and methodological statement: d'Anville explains how the Jesuit survey data for China, Tartary and Tibet were reduced to his maps (see M013, M016, M022)
Research notes
Gallica dc:date 1776 and imprint "Pekin" (a false imprint) should both be recorded. The Eclaircissemens geographiques sur la carte de l'Inde (1753) and the Nouvel atlas de la Chine (1737, M022) are related d'Anville items.
The Gallica SRU also lists manuscript and printed states of d'Anville's 1733 Tibet-Kashgar-Hami map (btv1b53008987t manuscript; btv1b5963120b, btv1b5963119p, btv1b530275540, btv1b84929416 printed; btv1b53027528j 1750 manuscript): map leads related to M016/M022, not separately verified.
Why it matters
D'Anville's own statement of the sources behind the standard eighteenth-century maps of Chinese Tartary and Tibet (M013, M016, M022): needed to judge what on those maps is survey, what is Jesuit report, and what is inference.