Written source · English

Jesuits crossing Tibet and 'Tartary', 1603 to 1721 (with Desideri's account of Tibet)

Jesuit travellers' letters and Ippolito Desideri's Tibet memoir, quoted and checked by a 1924 editor, on the 'Tartars' who ruled, raided and invaded Tibet.

Full title An Account of Tibet (English abridged translation of Desideri’s Italian Relazione)

Ippolito Desideri; Filippo De Filippi, editor

Read the 12 passagesOpen the original book

Ippolito Desideri, an Italian Jesuit, crossed Ladakh and western Tibet to Lhasa in 1715 to 1716 and lived there until 1721, witnessing the Dzungar invasion of 1717. His Italian memoir (Notizie istoriche del Thibet, finished 1728 to 1733) stayed unpublished for nearly two centuries. The open text in this corpus is not the 1930s De Filippi translation (still in copyright) but C. Wessels, Early Jesuit Travellers in Central Asia 1603 to 1721 (The Hague, 1924), which quotes Desideri's manuscript at length in English and also covers Bento de Goes, Antonio de Andrade, Estevao Cacella, Joao Cabral and John Grueber, printing some Portuguese letters in the original. Its 'Tartars' are the Mongol powers around Tibet and, after 1720, the Manchus.

How they knew
Part eyewitness
Who “Tartar” means here
Mostly Mongols: the Qoshot Mongol rulers and garrisons of Tibet, and the Dzungar Mongols of 'Independent Tartary' (Giongar) who invaded in 1717. For the Portuguese Jesuits 'Tartary' (Sopo) is Mongolia and even includes Tibet; after 1720 'Chinese Tartars' means the Manchus of the Qing court.
Why read it
It shows 'Tartar' as a living political label in 1600s and 1700s Tibet: Tartar princes, princesses and armies, a Tartar monastery in Lhasa, and the local names Europeans matched to 'Tartary' on their maps.
Watch out
Most quotations are Wessels's English renderings of Italian and Portuguese manuscripts, and some passages are Wessels's own summaries; the authoritative Italian text of Desideri is not in this corpus. Wessels also adds a great deal of modern commentary.

What it says: 12 passages

The Dzungar 'Tartars' storm Lhasa, 1717

Editorial contextWessels summarises Desideri's eyewitness chapters on the Dzungar invasion. Invited by the discontented great monasteries, 'the Tartar king' of Independent Tartary sent 6,000 men under Tsering Dondup, who reached Lhasa in late 1717; on the night of 30 November the gates were opened to them by allies inside. Lhazang Khan ('Ginghes Khang') fled to the Potala, and the same page says the city was then plundered for two days. Desideri was at Sera monastery and lost only a few things left with the Capuchins.

At their instance the Tartar king crossed into Tibet in 1717 with an army of 6,000 men under the command of General Zze-ring-ton-drup … in the night of November 30 a general assault on Lhasa was delivered the gates were thrown open by their confederates. In a couple of hours there was nothing left for Ginghes Khang but to seek safety in the Potala Palace.

C. Wessels (1924), summarising Ippolito Desideri's eyewitness account

About Dzungar Mongols ('the Tartar king' and his army)

Keep in mind

A summary, not Desideri's own words; Wessels notes that other histories (Waddell) tell the story differently.

A lama builds a new wall against the conquerors

Editorial contextDescribing 'Giegazze' (Shigatse), seat of the lama second only to the Dalai Lama, Desideri praises the lama's courage in 1717. When the conquerors of Lhasa, the Dzungar Tartars, marched on the town to plunder its rich temple and monastery, he quickly fortified both with a new wall, armed his people and drove them off. On the next page Desideri adds that the damage from the siege was repaired and the town enlarged in 1720.

Every one admired his firmness and courage when he offered heroic resistance to the conquerors of Lhasa, who after the sack of this town marched on Giegazze to make the fabulously rich temple and the monastery share the same fate. In a short time he fortified both with a new wall, armed his people and forced the enemy to retreat.

Ippolito Desideri, in C. Wessels's English translation (1924)

About Dzungar Mongols ('the conquerors of Lhasa')

Keep in mind

Desideri was at Sera near Lhasa during the invasion, so the defence of Shigatse is reported, not seen.

Lhasa's walls and gates, built by 'Ginges-Khang'

Editorial contextDesideri says Lhasa had anciently been an open town, and that 'Ginges-Khang' was the first to protect it with gates and fortifications, with a fort guarding each of the four approaches through the mountains. Ginges-Khang is Desideri's name for Lhazang Khan, the ruler killed by the Dzungars in 1717. The editor's footnote on the same page adds that these defences were built late in the 1600s and pulled down again in 1722 by order of the Kangxi emperor, with only some gates and fragments of wall surviving.

In ancient times, our missionary goes on to tell us, Lhasa was an open place, Ginges-Khang being the first to protect it at various points with gates and fortifications. Situated in a plain the town is enclosed by mountains so as to leave only four approaches each of them defended by a fortification.

C. Wessels (1924), paraphrasing Ippolito Desideri's manuscript

About Lhazang Khan ('Ginges-Khang'), the Qoshot Mongol ruler of Lhasa

Keep in mind

Wessels's footnote insists Ginges-Khang is 'not the famous Mogul despot' (Genghis Khan) but a Tibetan king; modern historians identify him as Lhazang Khan of the Qoshot Mongols. Dating of the walls comes from Koeppen via the editor.

A Lhasa monastery 'reserved for the Tartars'

Editorial contextIn his tour of Lhasa's temples Desideri notes three more Gelugpa temples and monasteries, one of them in the north-eastern quarter 'reserved for the Tartars', that is for Mongol monks who came to study in Tibet. Elsewhere he says the great monastic universities drew students from Ladakh, Tartary and China. The editor could find no later confirmation that this house was specially for Tartars.

"There are at Lhasa", the narrator continues, "three other idolatrous temples and monasteries of the same sect [the Gelugpa or Yellow-caps]. One is situated in the north-eastern quarter and is reserved for the Tartars. The other two lie towards the east, one near the town-limit, the other just on it, both called by the same name Ramo-cce."

Ippolito Desideri, in C. Wessels's English translation (1924); bracketed words are Wessels's

About Mongol monks ('Tartars')

Keep in mind

'Idolatrous' is the missionary's own religious judgement. Wessels identifies the house tentatively with the Muru monastery and notes that later writers do not mention its being for Tartars.

Show 8 more passages

A Tartar prince's widow commands the frontier

Editorial contextAt Gartok on the western frontier Desideri found a permanent force of Tartar and Tibetan soldiers guarding the fortress of Tashigang and watching everyone who entered Tibet. Its commander, a Tartar prince, had died, and his widow had taken over the command until a new governor arrived. Desideri and his companion travelled to Lhasa under her protection; later in the book he says this 'Tartar princess' retired to a nunnery near Shigatse.

in a large plain called Cartoà a strong, permanent force of Tartar and Tibetan soldiers was stationed not only for the defence of the frontier-fortress of Treéscy-Khang and the surrounding settlements, but more especially to watch all those who from that side entered the country. The commander, a Tartar prince, had died and his widow had taken over the command

C. Wessels (1924), closely paraphrasing Ippolito Desideri's manuscript

About Tartar (Mongol) garrison of Tibet

Keep in mind

Wessels's paraphrase rather than Desideri's exact words; the Tartars here are the Mongol garrison serving the Mongol-descended ruler of Lhasa.

Tartar raiders on the road to the Great Wall

Editorial contextThe Portuguese lay brother Bento de Goes travelled overland from India towards China in 1603 to 1605. On the last stretch he found the country between Cialis and the Chinese wall 'notorious for its Tartar raids': merchants crossed it by night in silence, and the bodies of lone Muslim travellers lay by the road. Goes adds a telling detail (in the sentence that follows this excerpt): the Tartars did not usually kill the local people, whom they treated as their servants and herdsmen and occasionally robbed of their flocks.

"The country between Cialis and the Chinese wall," Goes writes, "is notorious for its Tartar raids, so that traders always cross it in the greatest fear, sometimes even under cover of night and in the strictest silence. One often comes across the dead bodies of Mohammedans who have attempted the journey unaccompanied, though on the other hand the Tartars are not wont to kill the native population

Bento de Goes, as recorded in Matteo Ricci's Commentari and translated by C. Wessels (1924)

About Tartars (Mongol and Turkic nomads of the steppe)

Keep in mind

Goes died in China in 1607; his account survives through Ricci's reworking of his notes, so the wording is Ricci's.

Decrees in Chinese, Tartar and Tibetan

Editorial contextAfter the Qing armies drove the Dzungars out in 1720, Desideri reports, Tibet's government passed to the Emperor of China, run by ministers some of whom were Chinese, some 'Chinese Tartars' and some Tibetans. Every decree had to be issued in three languages: Chinese, Tartar and Tibetan. 'Chinese Tartars' was the usual period term for the Manchus, so within one book 'Tartar' shifts from Mongols to Manchus.

Till October 1720 Tibet was a monarchy under an absolute and independent king. From that time, however, all power has passed into the hands of the Emperor of China and the actual government consists of a body of ministers appointed by him, some of whom are Chinese, some Chinese Tartars, others again Tibetans. All decrees must be promulgated in three languages Chinese, Tartar and Tibetan.

C. Wessels (1924), summarising Ippolito Desideri's manuscript

About 'Chinese Tartars' (Manchus of the Qing court)

Keep in mind

A summary by Wessels, not Desideri's own words. Which 'Tartar' language is meant (Manchu or Mongol) is not stated.

Tibet plus Mongolia make 'great Tartary'

Editorial contextWriting from Tsaparang in 1626, the Portuguese Jesuit Antonio de Andrade lists the kingdoms of Tibet and says that, together with the empire of the 'Sopo' (Mongols), they make up 'great Tartary'. He also demotes fabled Cathay to a single large town ruled by the Mongol king. It is a neat example of how elastic the European label 'Tartary' was: here it swallows Tibet as well as Mongolia.

Together with the great empire of the Sopò [Mongolia], which borders on China on the one side and on Moscovia on the other, they form great Tartary". … "The famous Cathayo is not a separate kingdom but a large town which is called Katay, the capital of a province situated much nearer to China and which is said to be ruled by the great king of the Sopôs"

Antonio de Andrade, letter of 15 August 1626, in C. Wessels's English translation (1924); bracketed word is Wessels's

About Tibetans and the Sopo (Mongols)

Keep in mind

Andrade had not been to Mongolia; his picture of 'great Tartary' and Cathay comes from what he was told in western Tibet and from European maps.

In Bhutan, Tartary is called 'Sopo'

Editorial contextIn a Portuguese letter of 1627 from the kingdom he calls Cambirasi (Bhutan), Estevao Cacella reports that the local king says the people of Sopo are more valiant than the Chinese and usually beat them, which Cacella links to the well known wars of the Tartars with China. He then explains why nobody there has heard of 'Cathay': local people use quite different names, calling China 'Guena', Tartary 'Sopo' and Tibet 'Potente'.

but that the [people] of Sopo are more valiant, and so this one commonly defeats the Chinese, all of which agrees with what is so well known of the war of the Tartars with the Chinese … for neither China nor Tartary nor Tibet is known by these names, of which they have no knowledge; and they call China Guena, Tartary Sopo and Tibet Potente

Working translation

Original wording

porem que a do Sopo he mais esforçada, e assi commummente esta vence os Chinas, o que tudo diz com o que he tão sabido da guerra dos Tartaros com as Chinas … pois nem a China nem a Tartarea, nem o Tibet são conhecidos por estes nomes, dos quaes não tem noticia; e a China chamão Guena, a Tartarea Sopo e ao Tibet Potente

Estevao Cacella, S.J., Portuguese letter from Cambirasi (Bhutan), 4 October 1627, printed in Wessels's Appendix II

About Sopo (Mongols) as described to Jesuits in Bhutan

Keep in mind

Cacella is reporting what the Bhutanese king told him and matching it to European ideas about Tartars and Cathay; the equations are his own guesses.

'Sokpo, also called Giongar, that is to say, independent Tartary'

Editorial contextDescribing Ladakh, Desideri lists its neighbours and names the land to the north as 'Sokpo, also called Giongar, that is to say, independent Tartary'. Sokpo is the Tibetan word for the Mongols, and Giongar is the Dzungar state. The same page describes Leh, the Ladakhi capital, as a town climbing a mountain to the palace and fort, with 'no large towns' elsewhere, only villages, farmsteads and castles.

On the former side it borders on Baltistan, towards the north on Caxkar and some parts of the kingdom of Sokpo, also called Giongar, that is to say, independent Tartary.

Ippolito Desideri, in C. Wessels's English translation of the Italian manuscript (1924)

About Dzungar Mongols

Keep in mind

Translation by Wessels from the manuscript; Desideri knew Ladakh first hand but the Dzungar lands only by report.

A Lhasa ruler 'of ancient Tartar stock'

Editorial contextThe Austrian Jesuit John Grueber reached Lhasa in 1661. As Wessels summarises his report, Tibet then had two kings: a secular governor 'of ancient Tartar stock' who ran the government, and the Dalai Lama, worshipped as a god in his palace. Wessels adds that the Potala was begun in 1642 by the Fifth Dalai Lama, who had risen to power 'with the aid of the Tartar prince Gushi Khan'. The Tartars here are the Qoshot Mongols who held military power in Tibet.

There are two kings in this kingdom; one, the Deva (Deba), of ancient Tartar stock, carries on the government; the other, who is worshipped as a deity, lives in seclusion within the precincts of his palace. … the energetic Ngavang Lobsang, who from being the head of the Tashi Lhumpo monastery had, with the aid of the Tartar prince Gushi Khan, worked his way up

C. Wessels (1924), summarising John Grueber's 1661 report (via Kircher) and adding his own historical comment

About Qoshot Mongols (Gushi Khan and his heirs)

Keep in mind

The first sentence is Wessels's paraphrase of Grueber as printed by Kircher; the Gushi Khan sentence is Wessels's own history, not Grueber's.

Shambhala placed in 'Great Tartary' on the maps

Editorial contextJoao Cabral, writing in 1628 after travelling in central Tibet (U-Tsang), says the kingdom is bounded on the north by the Tartars, with whom the king sometimes fights, and that many Tartars come there who say their religion is the same. He then decides that the famous kingdom of 'Xembala', which his companion Cacella had hoped was Cathay, is really the 'Great Tartary' of European maps. Xembala is the European spelling of Shambhala, the hidden kingdom of Tibetan Buddhist tradition, so here a legendary land is being matched to a map label.

On the north it borders on the Tartars, with whom this king sometimes quarrels, and many of them come here who say that their religion is the same. … Xembala, which in my opinion is not Cathay but that which on the maps they call Great Tartary, lies further off to the north.

Working translation

Original wording

Pollo norte confina com os Tartaros com os quaes este Rei as vezes briga, e aqui vem muitos os quaes dizem que a sua Lei he a mesma. … Xembala que a meu ver não he o Catayo, mas aquella que nos Mapas chamão gram Tartarea fica mais desviada para o Norte.

Joao Cabral, S.J., Portuguese letter from Hugli, 17 June 1628, printed in Wessels's Appendix III

About Tartars north of Tibet

Keep in mind

The identification of Xembala with Shambhala is a modern one; Cabral himself treats it as a real kingdom he has only heard of. The 'same religion' remark refers to Mongol Buddhists.

The fine print

How we know

firsthand The author saw the places or people described.

firsthand observation (Desideri crossed Ladakh and western Tibet to Lhasa 1715-1716 and lived there until 1721, witnessing the Dzungar invasion of 1717)

Research notes

Why it matters

Resolves the access problem of L003: open copies of the English Desideri exist. Italian original remains to be located (Puini, Il Tibet, 1904; Petech, I missionari italiani nel Tibet e nel Nepal V-VII, 1954-56): neither found on IA, Gallica or Europeana this pass.

Places named

Ladakh; Western Tibet (Tsaparang); Lhasa; Kuti; Nepal; Kashmir

Peoples named

Tibetans and Tibetan polities
Western Mongols (Oirat, Dzungar, Kalmyk)
Named only as Tartars or Tatars
Mongols and the Mongol empire
Jurchen and Manchus (incl. the Qing as a Manchu dynasty)

Tibetans (Lhazang Khan); Dzungar Mongols ('Tartars'); Qoshot Mongols; Kangxi Qing intervention; Ladakhi kingdom

Keep exploring