Written source · English

Brother Bento de Góis and the search for Cathay

How a Jesuit lay brother crossed from Mughal India over the Pamirs to the Chinese border, 1603 to 1607, and proved that Cathay was China, told in Ricci's Latin history of the China mission.

Full title Journey of Benedict Goës from Agra to Cathay

Bento de Góis; Matteo Ricci / Nicolas Trigault transmission

Read the 12 passagesOpen the original book

Bento de Góis, a Portuguese Jesuit lay brother at the Mughal court, set out in January 1603, disguised as an Armenian merchant, to find the Christian kingdom of Cathay that Muslim traders described. He crossed Kabul, Badakhshan and the Pamirs to Yarkand, then went east by Cialis, Turfan and Hami to Suzhou (Jiuquan) inside the Great Wall, where he died in 1607 just after a messenger from Matteo Ricci in Peking reached him. His diary was destroyed, so Ricci rebuilt the story from his companion Isaac the Armenian and surviving letters. Nicolas Trigault published it in Latin in De Christiana expeditione apud Sinas (Augsburg, 1615), the book that also carries Ricci's own long account of China. This corpus has two scans of that 1615 edition.

How they knew
Part eyewitness
Who “Tartar” means here
Mostly the Mongols: the Yuan conquerors who ruled China until 1368, and the steppe nomads who still raided the frontier beyond the Great Wall in 1605. Chinese Muslims are described as Tartar remnants, and the Latin word also shades into 'tartareus', hellish.
Why read it
This is the book that settled that Marco Polo's Cathay and Cambalu were China and Peking, names Europe had learned from the Tartars. It also gives a Jesuit's view of the Mongol past and of the nomads beyond the Wall.
Watch out
Goes's own words are lost: the route was pieced together by Ricci from Isaac's testimony and letters, then Latinised and edited by Trigault. The Latin OCR runs words together and misreads letters, and some place names are uncertain.

What it says: 12 passages

The scrap of paper that proved Cambalu was Peking

Editorial contextAt Cialis, Goes met merchants coming back from a trade 'embassy' to Peking who had lodged in the same foreigners' palace as Ricci and his companions. They did not know the Jesuits' Chinese names, but they had rescued from a servant's sweepings a note written in Portuguese. That settled it: Cathay differed from China only in name, and the capital the Muslims called Cambalu was Peking. Cialis is usually identified with Karashahr in Xinjiang.

to make their story more certain they added a scrap of paper written by our men in Portuguese, which they had snatched from the rubbish of a servant sweeping out a room … with this news our Brother and his companion were much cheered, and from then on they had no doubt that Cathay differed from the kingdom of China in name only, and that the royal city the Saracens call Cambalu is Peking

Working translation

Original wording

addiderunt etiam ad fidem acrius exigendam schedulam a Nostris scriptam sermone Lusitano, quam e famuli cubiculum verrentis sordibus eripuerant … his nunciis cum Socio Noster satis recreati sunt, nihilque deinde dubitarunt Cataium a Sinensi Regno solo nomine discrepare, ipsamque Regiam a Saracenis Cambalu appellatam Pechinum esse

Nicolas Trigault, from Matteo Ricci's commentaries, reporting Goes's journey (1615)

About Muslim merchants returning from Peking; Goes and Isaac

CitiesBeijingearly 15th century (written about 1610)

Peking: the Tartar kings' city becomes the Northern Court

Editorial contextRicci explains why China had two capitals. The Ming founder ruled from Nanjing, but his son Yongle, who had guarded the northern frontier against the recently expelled Tartars, seized the throne and moved his seat north, fearing the Tartars would break out again to win back the empire. He chose the very city where the Tartar kings had lived and renamed it Peking, 'Northern Court'. The Mongol capital (Dadu, Khanbaliq) thus became Ming Beijing.

And since he had more strength and loyalty in the northern provinces, and it was likely that the Tartars would break out from there to recover their tyranny over the kingdom, he decided to settle in those parts, and indeed in the very city where the Tartar kings lived when they ruled the Chinese. He named that city Pequim, that is, Northern Court, on the model of the southern one called Nanquim.

Working translation

Original wording

Et quoniam in aquilonaribus provinciis plus habebat virium ac fidei, & Tartaros inde ad recuperandam regni tyrannidem credibile erat erupturos, iis in partibus considere statuit; & quidem ea in Urbe, in qua Reges Tartari, cum Sinis imperitabant, morabantur. Eam Urbem ipse Pequim, id est, Borealem Curiam, ad similitudinem australis, quae dicitur Nanquim nominavit.

Matteo Ricci, edited and translated into Latin by Nicolas Trigault (1615)

About The Tartar (Yuan) kings and the Ming emperor Yongle

Walls and fortress towns built against the Tartars

Editorial contextWhere the Great Wall ends in the far north-west, the account explains, there was a gap of some two hundred miles through which the Tartars, shut out by the Wall, kept trying to raid China. To stop them the Chinese built two heavily fortified cities, Kanchou (Zhangye) and Suchou (Jiuquan), with picked troops and their own viceroy. Here the walls and forts are Chinese works built to keep the Tartars out.

At the western part of the kingdom of China, where it bends to the north, those famous walls come to an end, and there was a stretch of about two hundred miles through which the Tartars, shut out by the walls, often tried to break into China, and still try even now, though with less danger: for two very strongly fortified cities have been built to beat back their attacks

Working translation

Original wording

Ad occiduam Sinensis regni partem, qua in Boream flectitur, celebres illi muri finiuntur, & spatium erat ducentorum fere milliariorum, quo spatio Tartari muris exclusi, saepe in Sinarum regnum excurrentes tentabant ingressum, & etiamnunc, sed minore periculo tentant: extructae sunt enim ad retundendos eorum impetus urbes duae munitissimae

Nicolas Trigault, from Matteo Ricci's commentaries (1615)

About Chinese (Ming) garrisons facing the Tartars (Mongols)

A note on this quote

The scan is too rough to double-check this quote by machine. Compare it with the page.

BuildingsNanjingabout 1599 (instruments from the 13th or 14th century)

Bronze star instruments from the Tartar era

Editorial contextOn a hill at Nanjing, Ricci inspected huge bronze astronomical instruments: armillary spheres, a globe, a gnomon on a great marble base. He later saw identical ones at Peking and concluded they came from the same caster, made when the Tartars ruled China. Because they were so well made, he guessed a foreigner trained in European sciences had built them. They were set for the wrong latitude at Nanjing, which he took as a sign they had been moved.

Some years later Father Matteo saw similar instruments at Peking, or rather the same, so little did they differ from one another, so that there seems no doubt they were cast by the same craftsman; and it is certain they were cast at the time when the Tartars ruled the Chinese. From this we may reasonably guess that they were made by some foreigner skilled in our sciences.

Working translation

Original wording

Spectavit etiam P. Matthaeus post annos aliquot similes Pechini machinas, aut easdem potius, ita nihil aliae ab aliis discrepabant, nihil ut dubium videatur, ab eodem fusas artifice: & quidem eo tempore fusas constat, quo Tartari Sinis imperitabant. unde non temere coniectare possumus, eas ab aliquo externo perito disciplinarum nostrarum fuisse conflatas.

Matteo Ricci, edited and translated into Latin by Nicolas Trigault (1615)

About Instrument makers under Tartar (Yuan) rule

Keep in mind

Ricci's guess about a foreign maker is doubtful: historians usually credit the designs to the Yuan astronomer Guo Shoujing, and the Peking set he saw was a Ming copy of the Yuan originals.

Show 8 more passages

Nomads beyond the Wall who ate only meat

Editorial contextBetween Cialis and the Chinese frontier, the account says, the country was notorious for Tartar raids: merchants scouted from the hills by day and travelled silently by night, and passed Muslim travellers who had been murdered for going alone. The Tartars rarely killed the settled locals, calling them their slaves and shepherds whose flocks they could seize. They refused grain and rice as fodder for animals, lived on meat including horse, mule and camel, and were said to live past a hundred.

although the Tartars rarely kill the local people themselves, saying that they are their slaves and shepherds, from whom they carry off flocks of sheep and herds of cattle. They themselves eat neither grain nor rice nor any other pulse, saying that this is fodder for beasts, not food for men; so they live on meat alone, and do not shrink from horses, mules or camels. And yet it is said that they live very long, often past a hundred years.

Working translation

Original wording

quanquam raro Tartari indigenas ipsos mactent, asserentes eos esse servos suos ac pastores, quibus arietum greges, & boum armenta eripiunt; sed neque frumento, neque oriza aliove legumine ipsi vescuntur, dicentes hoc iumentorum esse non hominum pabulum: sola igitur carne vesci solent, nec ab equis, mulis, aut Camelis abhorrent, & tamen fama est eos diutissime vivere, & fere annorum centum excedere senectutem.

Nicolas Trigault, from Matteo Ricci's commentaries, reporting Goes's journey (1615)

About Tartars (Mongol nomads north and west of the Great Wall)

Keep in mind

Travellers' report passed through Isaac the Armenian and Ricci; the hundred-year lifespan is explicitly rumour ('fama est').

The scan is too rough to double-check this quote by machine. Compare it with the page.

Daily lifeChinaabout 1583 to 1610

Chinese warhorses that bolt at a Tartar neigh

Editorial contextDescribing Chinese livestock, Ricci says the Chinese do not know how to break horses and simply geld them to make them docile. Their cavalry horses are countless but so feeble that they flee at the mere neigh of a Tartar horse, which makes them nearly useless in war. It is a Jesuit's jab at Ming cavalry and a measure of the fear the steppe horsemen still inspired.

The Chinese hardly know how to break them; all those used for everyday work are tamed by gelding. War horses are almost countless, but so degenerate and unwarlike that they cannot bear even the neigh of a Tartar horse without running away

Working translation

Original wording

Eos Sinae domare minime norunt, castrati omnes mansuescunt, quotquot ad usus quotidianos adhibentur. Equi porro militares sunt propemodum innumerabiles, sed ii ita degeneres atque imbelles, ut ne hinnitu quidem equi Tartari sine fuga ferant

Matteo Ricci, edited and translated into Latin by Nicolas Trigault (1615)

About Tartars (Mongol horsemen), compared with the Chinese

Keep in mind

A sweeping judgement meant to impress European readers.

Fake embassies from 'Tartar princelings'

Editorial contextAt Suzhou, the account explains, caravans from the west entered China as 'embassies' bringing tribute of jade and other goods every six years, with forged letters from their kings offering submission. The emperor paid their costs, so the posts were bought and sold. China received similar embassies from Cochinchina, Siam, the Ryukyus, Korea and some Tartar princelings, at huge cost to the treasury; Ricci thinks the officials knew it was a sham and kept it up to flatter the emperor.

when the time for the embassy comes, they forge official letters from their kings offering the King of China the homage of a vassal. The Chinese admit similar embassies from various kingdoms, from Cochinchina, Siam, the Ryukyus and Korea, and from some Tartar princelings, at an incredible cost to the public treasury; by these tricks the Chinese themselves (who are well aware of the fraud) deceive their own King

Working translation

Original wording

cum tempus legationis advenit publicas Regum suorum litteras effingunt, quibus Sinarum Regi clientelare obsequium deferunt. Similes legationes e variis regnis admittunt Sinae e regnis Caucincino, Sian, Leuchieu, Coriano, & ab aliquot Tartarorum Regulis non sine incredibili aerarii publici sumptu, quibus artibus ipsi Sinae (qui fraudem minime ignorant) Regem suum ludunt

Nicolas Trigault, from Matteo Ricci's commentaries (1615)

About Western merchants posing as envoys; minor Tartar rulers

Keep in mind

A hostile outsider's reading of the tribute system.

A 'Tartar custom': sharing out a dead man's goods

Editorial contextAfter Goes died at Suzhou, the Muslim merchants of the caravan seized his goods, destroyed his diary (which recorded their debts) and bound his companion Isaac, threatening to kill him unless he invoked Muhammad. The account explains that among these merchants a 'Tartarea' custom had taken hold: the goods of anyone who died on the road were divided among all. Three centuries earlier Pegolotti (W116) warned that the lord of the land seized a dead merchant's goods on the Tartar road.

Among those merchants a thoroughly Tartar custom has taken hold, that the goods of merchants who die on the road are divided among them all; for this reason they bound Benedict's companion Isaac and threatened him with death unless he called on Muhammad.

Working translation

Original wording

Tartarea plane consuetudine inter Negotiatores illos invaluit, ut morientium in itinere Negotiatorum bona inter omnes dividantur, hac ex causa Benedicti Socium Isaac vinxerunt, mortem minati, nisi Mahometem inclamasset.

Nicolas Trigault, from Matteo Ricci's commentaries (1615)

About Muslim caravan merchants at Suzhou

Keep in mind

'Tartarea' can mean 'Tartar' or 'hellish' in Latin, and here probably carries both. The story comes from the Jesuit side of a dispute.

The nameBeijing13th century (written about 1610)

Cathay: the Tartars' name for China

Editorial contextRicci explains why Europe thought Cathay and China were two countries. Marco Polo came when the Tartars ruled China, perhaps with them, and so Europe learned the country under the names the Tartars used: Cathay, with its royal city Cambalu. The Portuguese later brought home the name China and the city name Peking, and mapmakers drew two kingdoms side by side. On the previous page he offers a folk etymology that splits Campalu into Tartar 'Cam' (great) and the Chinese words 'Pa' (north) and 'Lu' (Tartars); the name is really Turkic Khanbaliq, 'city of the khan'.

From this it is plain that Marco Polo the Venetian entered this kingdom at the time when the Tartars ruled the Chinese, and perhaps entered with them. Through his writings the kingdom of China became known to Europe by the name the Tartars used, calling it Cathay and its royal city Cambalu. … At present, however, no region outside the Chinese walls is found that is called Cathay.

Working translation

Original wording

inde plane apparet, Marcum Paulum Venetum eo tempore in hoc regnum penetrasse, quo Tartari Sinis imperitabant, & fortasse cum illis ipsis eo penetrasse. Eius deinde commentariis Europae, Sinarum Regnum innotuit eo nomine, quo Tartari utebantur, Cataium videlicet & urbem Regiam Cambalu appellantes. … Hoc tamen tempore nulla extra muros Sinenses Regio reperitur, quae Cataium vocitetur.

Matteo Ricci, edited and translated into Latin by Nicolas Trigault (1615)

About Tartars (Mongols) who ruled China in Marco Polo's day

The nameChina13th century (written about 1610)

Was China's Tartar conqueror Tamerlane?

Editorial contextRicci writes that China had never been wholly conquered by foreigners until a Tartar leader invaded; his line ruled until 1368, when the Chinese threw off the yoke and the Ming founder Hongwu expelled the Tartars. Some Jesuits guessed this conqueror was Tamerlane, because the Chinese called him 'Tiemor'. Ricci gives up and simply calls him 'the Tartar'. The Chinese name was almost certainly Tiemuzhen, that is Temüjin (Chinggis Khan), not Timur, who lived a century later and never reached China.

yet we do not read that it was ever wholly conquered by foreign peoples until, in the year of our salvation …, some leader from Tartary, a conqueror of kingdoms, invaded this kingdom with his victorious army. Some of our men, on conjectures that in my judgement are not slight, think this leader was Tamerlane or one of his successors, for the Chinese call him Tiemor … Whoever he was, I shall call him the Tartar.

Working translation

Original wording

nunquam tamen prius ab externis populis legitur universim esse subactum, quam anno nostrae salutis … e Tartaria Dux nescio quis, regnorum domitor, in hoc regnum sese cum exercitu victore immisisset. Eum Ducem nonnulli e nostris, nec levibus, meo iudicio, coniecturis Tamerlanem, vel e successoribus eius aliquem fuisse arbitrantur. Eum enim Sinae Tiemor appellant … Quisquis is fuerit, Tartarum appellabo.

Matteo Ricci, edited and translated into Latin by Nicolas Trigault (1615)

About Tartars (Mongols) who conquered China

Keep in mind

The year is illegible in both scans and is omitted. The Tamerlane identification is wrong.

The scan is too rough to double-check this quote by machine. Compare it with the page.

The nameMacauearly 1600s

Chinese Muslims as 'remnants of the Tartars'

Editorial contextTelling of a clash near Macao, the account notes that one of the Chinese magistrates was a 'Saracen' (Muslim) by origin and religion. Ricci explains that many remnants of the Tartars stayed on in China after the Mongols fell; after four generations they count as natives and may even sit the examinations and hold office. It shows Europeans linking China's Muslim communities with the Mongol period.

Among these magistrates was one who was a Saracen by origin and religion: for many of the remnants of the Tartars remained in that kingdom, who after the fourth generation are held to be natives and are not barred even from the literary degrees and public offices.

Working translation

Original wording

Ex iis Magistratibus erat unus origine ac professione Saracenus: nam ex Tartarorum reliquiis multi in eo regno remanserunt, qui post quartam generationem pro indigenis habiti, ne a litterariis quidem gradibus publicisque muneribus prohibentur.

Matteo Ricci, edited and translated into Latin by Nicolas Trigault (1615)

About Chinese Muslims, described as descendants of the Tartars

Keep in mind

Ricci's own explanation; many Chinese Muslims descend from Central Asian and Persian Muslims settled under the Mongols rather than from Mongols themselves.

The scan is too rough to double-check this quote by machine. Compare it with the page.

'A Tartarean law' and the image of 'some Tartar'

Editorial contextAt Nanchang, local graduates petitioned to have the Jesuits expelled. In Trigault's Latin their complaint says the foreigners had moved from cramped lodgings to grand houses, preached a 'tartarea' law, and handed out pictures of 'some Tartar or Saracen' they called God come down from heaven. The word play is Latin: tartareus means hellish, from Tartarus, while 'tartarus' here also means a barbarian foreigner. It is Trigault's rendering, not the petition's own Chinese wording.

that these same men at first lived in cramped lodgings, but have now bought others, roomy and magnificent; that they preach a Tartarean law and lead the ignorant crowd into deception … that they hand out certain images of some Tartar or Saracen, whom they said was God, who had come down from heaven to teach and set free mankind

Working translation

Original wording

Eos ipsos primum in angustis sedibus habitasse, nunc vero alias capaces atque magnificas coemisse, legem ab iisdem tartaream praedicari, rude vulgus in fraudem induci … eos certas imagines distribuere, nescio cuius tartari aut Saraceni, quem dicebant esse Deum, qui ad mortales instruendos liberandosque e caelo venerat

Chinese petitioners at Nanchang, as rendered in Latin by Nicolas Trigault (1615)

About Chinese scholars accusing the Jesuits; 'Tartar' as an insult

Keep in mind

A hostile petition summarised in Latin by the Jesuits' own historian.

The fine print

How we know

mixed Part firsthand observation, part drawn from other sources.

Traveler's surviving information mediated by others

Research notes
  • Goës died on journey; distinguish surviving notes/testimony and later reconstruction.

Why it matters

A land route connecting Mughal India with Cathay and Chinese geography.

Places named

Afghanistan; Pamirs; Kashgar; China

Keep exploring