Written source · English

Early English voyages to Russia and Persia, volume II

Letters, charters and travel reports of Anthony Jenkinson and other Muscovy Company Englishmen in Russia, on the Volga and in Persia, 1557 to 1581.

Full title Early Voyages and Travels to Russia and Persia

Anthony Jenkinson and other Muscovy Company travelers

Read the 11 passagesOpen the original book

The Muscovy Company sent English merchants down the Volga and across the Caspian in search of trade with Persia and Central Asia. E. Delmar Morgan and C. H. Coote edited their papers for the Hakluyt Society in 1886. This corpus scan is volume II only, so Anthony Jenkinson's famous 1558 journey to Bukhara (in volume I) is not here. What is here: Jenkinson's later letters, including one on the Crimean Tatar burning of Moscow in 1571, the Tsar's charters and letters, company instructions, Sir Humphrey Gilbert's discourse, and Hakluyt's narratives of later Persian voyages that passed Kazan, Astrakhan and the Nogai steppe.

How they knew
Part eyewitness
Who “Tartar” means here
Mostly the Crimean Tatars ('Crims', 'Krim Tartars') and the Nogais ('Nagaians') of the Volga steppe, both enemies or uneasy vassals of Muscovy. Jenkinson also calls the Central Asian khanates between the Caspian and Bukhara 'kingdoms of the Tartars', and 'Tartaria' still labels Kazan and the northern coast of Asia.
Why read it
It shows Tatars as sixteenth-century neighbours rather than legends: raiders who burned Moscow, river pirates, vassal townsfolk outside Astrakhan, and the ruins of an older stone town on the Volga.
Watch out
Only volume II is in the corpus. The OCR of the old spelling is often badly garbled, and several pieces are later compilations in Hakluyt rather than direct letters; the editors' footnotes are nineteenth-century additions.

What it says: 11 passages

The Crimean Tatars burn Moscow, 1571

Editorial contextWriting to Lord Burghley from Kholmogory in August 1571, Jenkinson lists Russia's woes: famine, the Tsar's executions, plague, and then the Crimean Tatars, who in late May routed the Tsar's army and set Moscow on fire. He reports that not one house was left standing and that more than 300,000 were said to have been burned or carried off as captives. The figures are hearsay, but the event is real.

a valyante natyon of Tartars, in the latter ende of May laste, inuadid this realme, gaue the Prynce an ouerthrowe in the feildes, cawsed him to retyre, burnte and consumed all the countrye before theim, and came to the cyttye of Musko, sett fyer one the same, not leauinge one house standinge

Anthony Jenkinson, letter to Lord Burghley, 8 August 1571 (ed. E. Delmar Morgan and C. H. Coote, 1886)

About Crimean Tatars under Khan Devlet Giray

Keep in mind

Jenkinson arrived after the fire and repeats reported numbers; he calls it 'a juste punyshment of God for such a wycked natyon' (the Russians).

Whirlwinds of fire: three hours that ended a city

Editorial contextA second account, printed by the chronicler John Stow and apparently drawn from a letter of the English survivor Thomas Glover, describes the fire as a storm of 'whirl wynds' that died down after three hours, leaving streets full of dead men and horses. Twenty-five people died in the English Company's house. The 'Tartar dog', the Crimean khan, retreated across the Oka that same night.

This crewell and sodayne destructyon cam vpon ye moscow in great and wonderfull whirl wynds, and at ye ende of thre owrs very calme agayne, and fayre wether, that men myght walke and se ye dede bodyes of men & horses to no small nomber … ye same daye that the tartar dogge had done this myscheffe, the nyght following he, with all his power, fled ouer the ryuar oca

Account printed by John Stow, apparently from a letter of Thomas Glover (ed. E. Delmar Morgan and C. H. Coote, 1886)

About Crimean Tatars and their khan

Keep in mind

The editors' note (p. 340) explains the chain of letters behind this text.

Tsar Ivan counts his years from the conquest of Kazan and Astrakhan

Editorial contextIvan IV's letter to Queen Elizabeth is dated not only by the year of the world and his reign but by his two great conquests of Tatar khanates: Kazan (1552) and Astrakhan (1554 to 1556). The seizure of these Tatar cities was so important to Muscovy that it became part of the Tsar's official dating and of his title.

the 23 yere of our Empire, since the wynning of Casane xvii yere, and of Astrecane XV yere.

Tsar Ivan IV, letter to Queen Elizabeth written at Vologda, 1569 (contemporary English version; ed. Morgan and Coote, 1886)

About Former Tatar khanates of Kazan and Astrakhan, now Russian

70,000 Turks and Tatars besiege Astrakhan

Editorial contextThe English merchants Banister and Ducket were held up at Astrakhan for six weeks by a great army of Turks and Tatars sent by the Sultan to take the town from Russia. Winter and news of a Russian relief army made them give up. The editors' note adds that this was the Ottoman campaign that also tried to dig a canal between the Volga and the Don.

In this towne of Astracan they were somewhat hindered of their iourney, and staied the space of 6. weekes by reason of a great armie of 70,000. Turkes and Tartares, which came thither vpon the instigation of the great Turke, hoping either to haue surprised it suddenly, or by continuance of siege to win the same.

Narrative written by 'P. I.' from the report of Lionel Plumtree, in Hakluyt (ed. Morgan and Coote, 1886)

About Ottoman Turks with Crimean Tatars

Show 7 more passages

A Nogai town outside Astrakhan's walls

Editorial contextWintering at Astrakhan, Christopher Burrough's party saw half of the Nogai Tatar settlement beside the Russian castle burn by accident. He notes that these Nogais were the Tsar's vassals, some seven thousand men, women and children. Weeks later other Nogais and Crimeans camped around Astrakhan with 1,400 horsemen but did not attack.

The Nagayes that inhabit that towne are the Emperour of Russia his vassals. It is supposed there are of them inhabiting that place, of men, women, and children, the number of seuen thousand. … The seuenth of March 1580. the Nagayes and Crims came before Astracan to the number of one thousand foure hundred horsemen, which incamped round about

Christopher Burrough's reports, in Hakluyt (ed. Morgan and Coote, 1886)

About Nogai Tatars (vassals of the Tsar) and raiding Crimeans

Keep in mind

The town's name (given on the previous page as the 'Yurt') is badly garbled in this OCR.

Ruins of a stone castle and horseman tombs at Uvek

Editorial contextSailing down the Volga, Burrough's party stopped at Uvek on the 'Crims side' (west bank) and saw the ruins of a fine stone castle and tombs of important people. One tombstone showed a mounted archer, and inscriptions the English took for Armenian letters. The narrative does not say who built it; the editors' index labels Uvek an old Tartar town, and it was in fact a Golden Horde city.

At this place had beene a very fayre stone castle, called by the name Oueake … There remaineth, at this day, to be seene a part of the ruines of the castle and certain tombs, wherein, as it seemeth, haue beene laid noble personages ; for vpon a tombe stone might be perceiued the forme of a horse, and a man sitting on it with a bowe in his hand

Christopher Burrough's reports, in Hakluyt (ed. Morgan and Coote, 1886)

About Unnamed former inhabitants (the editors' index calls Uvek an 'old Tartar town')

Keep in mind

The 'Armenian' reading of the inscriptions is the travellers' guess.

Nogai river raiders attack an English barge

Editorial contextForty miles above Astrakhan, the English barge was attacked by about 300 Nogai Tatars in eighteen boats, armed with swords, spears and bows. After a two-hour fight the English firearms drove them off, and the English later heard from an escaped Russian prisoner that 120 raiders had died. Banister, the editors note, survived thanks to a mail shirt.

the Nagaian Tartares, being a kind of theeuish and cruell people, made an assault vpon them with 18. boates of theirs, each of them being armed, some with swords, some with speares, and some others with bowes and arrowes, and the whole number of them they discouered to bee about 300. men.

Narrative written by 'P. I.' from the report of Lionel Plumtree, in Hakluyt (ed. Morgan and Coote, 1886)

About Nogai Tatars

Keep in mind

Written down secondhand from a participant; the casualty figure came from a prisoner.

The nameBukhara1558 to 1559

Five 'kingdoms of the Tartars' on the road to Bukhara

Editorial contextIn a late summary of his travels, Jenkinson says he went forty days beyond the Caspian through five kingdoms 'of the Tartars' and the lands of the Turkmen and 'Zayatay' (Chagatai) to the great city of Bukhara. The editors' note names the five as Mangishlak, Vazir, Urgench, Kath and Bukhara. Here 'Tartar' covers the Muslim Turkic states of Central Asia.

of the Tartars, and all the land of Turkenian and Zayatay, and so to the great citie of Boghar, in Bactria, not without great perils and dangers sundry times.

Anthony Jenkinson, summary of his travels (ed. Morgan and Coote, 1886)

About Turkmen and Uzbek khanates of Central Asia

Keep in mind

The sentence begins on the previous page ('passed through 5. kingdomes').

Crimeans, Nogais and 'the whole nation of the Tartarians'

Editorial contextAn English visitor to Ivan IV's court lists the Tsar's usual enemies: Lithuania, Poland, Sweden, Denmark, Livonia, and three kinds of Tatars. He separates the Crimeans and the Nogais from 'the whole nation of the Tartarians' and praises them all as tough fighters.

His enemies, with whom he hath warres for the most, are these : Litto, Poland, Sweden, Denmarke, Liefland, the Crimmes, Nagaians, and the whole nation of the Tartarians, which are a stoute and a hardie people as any vnder the Sunne.

Narrative of the 1557 voyage with the Russian envoy Osep Napea, attributed to Robert Best (ed. Morgan and Coote, 1886)

About Crimean Tatars, Nogais and other Tatars

Keep in mind

Authorship attribution to Robert Best is the editors' (following Hamel).

A town swallowed by the earth for its wickedness

Editorial contextNext to the ruined castle of Uvek, the Russians told the English, there had stood a town they called Sodom, which God had swallowed into the earth with part of the castle because of its people's wickedness. It is a local legend attached to real ruins, and the narrator clearly labels it as Russian report.

adioyning to the same was a towne called by Russes Sodom. This towne & part of the castle (by report of the Russes) was swallowed into the earth by the iustice of God, for the wickednesse of the people that inhabited the same.

Christopher Burrough's reports, in Hakluyt (ed. Morgan and Coote, 1886)

About Russians' legend about a ruined Volga town

Keep in mind

Legend reported by Russian boatmen, not observed.

A unicorn's horn on the coast of Tartaria

Editorial contextArguing for a sea route to China round the north of Asia, Jenkinson pointed to a unicorn's horn found on the 'coast of Tartaria', which he thought must have floated there from the east. Sir Humphrey Gilbert, reporting the debate, scoffs that the 'barbarous Tartarians' might not know a unicorn's horn at all, and that such a horn would not float. The editors note the many forms of the unicorn legend across Asia.

His second reason is, that there was an Vnicornes horne … found vpon the coast of Tartaria, which could not come (sayd … he) thither by any other meanes then with the tides

Sir Humphrey Gilbert, reporting Anthony Jenkinson's argument (ed. Morgan and Coote, 1886)

About 'Barbarous Tartarians' of the northern coast of Asia

Keep in mind

Nobody here saw the horn; it may have been a walrus or narwhal tusk, but the source does not say.

OCR normalized; printed margin notes omitted.

The fine print

How we know

firsthand The author saw the places or people described.

Merchant / envoy records

Research notes
  • 1886 Morgan/Coote edition; linked scan is one volume. UW link provides selected Jenkinson narrative.

Why it matters

Routes into Bukhara and trade geography.

Places named

Russia; Caspian; Bukhara; Persia

Keep exploring