Written source · English

Bogle's mission to the Panchen Lama and Manning's journey to Lhasa

An East India Company envoy in Tibet in 1774 to 1775 and an English scholar in Lhasa in 1811 to 1812, gathered with older missionary reports by Clements Markham.

Full title Narratives of the Mission of George Bogle to Tibet and of the Journey of Thomas Manning to Lhasa

George Bogle; Thomas Manning; Clements R. Markham, editor

Read the 13 passagesOpen the original book

This 1876 volume, edited by the geographer Clements R. Markham, prints the journals and letters of George Bogle, sent by Warren Hastings to the Panchen (Teshu) Lama in 1774 to 1775, and the diary of Thomas Manning, the first Englishman to reach Lhasa (1811 to 1812). It adds Hastings's own memorandum on Tibet and, in an appendix, older Catholic accounts: the Jesuit Grueber's crossing in 1661 and the Capuchin della Penna's description of Tibet (about 1730). Tartars appear as Mongol and Kalmyk pilgrims and traders, as the Mongol and Dzungar rulers and invaders of Tibet, and as the Manchu officials at Lhasa.

How they knew
Part eyewitness
Who “Tartar” means here
A loose word: Mongol and Oirat 'Kalmuk' pilgrims and traders at Tibetan monasteries; the Khoshut and Dzungar Mongols who ruled or invaded Tibet; the Manchu (Qing) officials at Lhasa; and in one case 'Turki Tatars' from Central Asia. Markham's own footnote calls this 'the indiscriminate use of the word Tatar or Tartar'.
Why read it
Shows the Tartars from the Tibetan side: as chess partners, pilgrims, traders in Siberian furs, and as the armies that fought over Lhasa, with a Tibetan-Mongol contrast between house dwellers and tent dwellers.
Watch out
Several voices share one book: Bogle, Manning, Hastings, Markham's footnotes, and the older missionary reports in the appendix, which are summaries or translations at second or third hand. Keep each speaker separate.

What it says: 13 passages

CitiesLhasa1717 to 1720

Dzungar 'Tatars' seize Lhasa, 1717

Editorial contextDella Penna records how the 'Gionkar Tatars' (Dzungars) invaded Tibet, plundered it and took Lhasa in November and December 1717, and how in 1720 a Qing army of 107,000 Chinese and 30,000 Tatars retook the city and installed a new Dalai Lama. Before this, he says, Tibet had a 'Tatar king' from the Kokonor chiefs as its protector. Here Tatars are the armies competing for Lhasa.

the Chinese army, composed of 107,000 Chinese soldiers and 30,000 Tatars, retook the metropolis of Lhasa, and made themselves masters of the whole of the kingdom of Tibet, on the 20th September, and overthrew completely the Gionkar Tatars, who had treacherously invaded Tibet, and with the connivance of a great part of its people, had plundered the country, and taken Lhasa, in November and December, 1717.

Francesco Orazio della Penna, Capuchin missionary (English version in Markham's appendix, from Klaproth's edition)

About Dzungar (Oirat) Mongols; Qing army of Chinese and Tatars

Keep in mind

Della Penna was in Tibet in these years; the troop figures are his and may be exaggerated.

Kalmuk Tatars with 'portable cities'

Editorial contextThe appendix summarises the letters of the Jesuit Johann Grueber, who crossed from China to Lhasa in 1661. Past the Yellow River his party entered the Kalmuk desert, whose people raided caravans and 'at certain seasons settle with their portable cities' on riverbanks. Their houses were tents of plaited sticks covered with coarse woollen cloth tied with cords, and the Jesuits sketched the people they met.

they immediately entered that vast and barren desert of Kalmuk, inhabited by the Kalmuk Tatars (the Eluths or Tatars of Koko-nor), who rove up and down it to rob the caravans, and at certain seasons settle with their portable cities on the banks of the rivers. … Their habitations are tents made with small sticks twisted or plaited together, and covered with a coarse woollen stuff bound together with cords.

Account of Johann Grueber's travels, from Astley's Collection of Voyages (reprinted in Markham's appendix)

About Kalmuk Tatars (Oirats of Kokonor)

Keep in mind

A compiler's paraphrase of Grueber's letters as abstracted by Athanasius Kircher; the bracketed gloss is part of the printed text.

A king's palace amid Tatar tents at Dam

Editorial contextDescribing the northern province of Chang, della Penna says that at Dam, the summer seat of the Tatar king of Tibet, there was nothing but the king's palace; everyone else, mostly Tatars and some Tibetans, lived in tents of felt and of cloth woven from hair. Beyond that, at Nakchu, there was a last fortress and again only tents.

in Dam there is nothing else but the palace belonging to the King and his court, the remainder of the inhabitants (which are mostly Tatars and the other Tibetans) dwelling in tents of felt and of cloth woven out of hair. Two days distant from Dam is Nak chu ka, where is the last fortress of Tibet, but no other dwellings except tents

Francesco Orazio della Penna, Capuchin missionary (English version in Markham's appendix, from Klaproth's edition)

About Tatars (Mongols) and Tibetan nomads

Chess with the Kalmuks at Teshu Lumbo

Editorial contextBogle's happiest hours at the Panchen Lama's monastery were spent playing chess with a party of Kalmuk pilgrims. He notes their rules (no castling, no stalemate) and how they played as a team: whenever a 'Siberian' sat down to play, two or three friends put their 'great bare heads together' over every move. Bogle learned to recruit his own team of Tatars and beat them.

In my first trials of skill with the Tatars, I used often to come off loser. For when a Siberian sits down to chess, he gets two or three of his countrymen to assist him; they lay all their great bare heads together canvassing and consulting about every move.

George Bogle (edited by Clements R. Markham, 1876)

About Kalmuks (Mongol pilgrims; Markham glosses them as Sokpas of north-east Tibet)

Show 9 more passages

Kalmuk pilgrims bring silver, furs and camels

Editorial contextWhile Bogle stayed at Teshu Lumbo a large Kalmuk caravan arrived to worship the Panchen Lama, offering silver, furs, silk and dromedaries. They stayed a month, went on to Lhasa, and then went home, about three months' journey north. Elsewhere Bogle says Kalmuk tribes came every year with camels loaded with Siberian furs and hides.

Among the rest of his votaries were a large caravan of Kalmuks, who offered up to his shrine talents of silver, furs, pieces of silk, and dromedaries. They remained about a month at Teshu Lumbo, and then proceeded to Lhasa, where, having spent about ten days, they returned to their own country, which was about three months' journey to the northward.

George Bogle (edited by Clements R. Markham, 1876)

About Kalmuks (Mongol pilgrims)

Fighting on horseback 'the Kalmuk way'

Editorial contextThe Panchen Lama told Bogle that the Lhasa regent did not want Gorkha envoys to enter Tibet in case they learned 'the manner of the Kalmuks fighting on horseback', which Tibetans practised too, and showed him the style with his hands. It hints at how Mongol cavalry methods were treated as a military secret.

Gesub, among other reasons, objects to their coming into Tibet lest they should learn the manner of the Kalmuks fighting on horseback, which is practised in this country (describing it at the same time by motions), and should teach it to the Gorkha Rajah's people.

The Panchen (Teshu) Lama, as reported by George Bogle (edited by Markham, 1876)

About Kalmuks (Mongols) and Tibetans

Daily lifeTibetabout 1730

The Tatars' mare's-milk beer

Editorial contextDella Penna compares Tibetan barley brandy with 'the beer which the Tatars make from the milk of mares', which he says looks and tastes like water but is surprisingly strong. It is a passing but clear reference to Mongol distilled milk spirit (arkhi) or kumiss.

a kind of brandy (mixed with the beer referred to), which does not differ greatly from the beer which the Tatars make from the milk of mares, and which is like water in appearance and taste, but is of considerable strength.

Francesco Orazio della Penna, Capuchin missionary (English version in Markham's appendix, from Klaproth's edition)

About Tatars (Mongols)

The nameTibetabout 1730

Tibet: 'the kingdom of dwellers in houses'

Editorial contextThe Capuchin della Penna, who lived in Lhasa for many years, explains the name Tibet as a Tatar (Mongol) word: Tangat katzar, which he says means the kingdom of people who live in houses, because the Tatars lived in tents of felt or yak-hair cloth while Tibetans lived in houses. Whatever the real etymology, it shows how people at the time drew the line between the two peoples by their dwellings.

The word Tibet is a Tatar corruption, the proper term being Thobot, or Tangat katzar. Tangat means dwellers in houses, and katzar country or kingdom; so the whole expression signifies "the kingdom of dwellers in houses," the Tatars dwelling in tents of felt, or of a coarse material woven from the hair of the yak or hairy ox, and the Tibetans in houses.

Francesco Orazio della Penna, Capuchin missionary (English version in Markham's appendix, from Klaproth's edition)

About Tibetans contrasted with Tatars (Mongols)

Keep in mind

The etymology is della Penna's and is doubtful; the contrast in ways of living is the useful part.

A Tatar gift that made Bogle look Russian

Editorial contextAn eccentric official decided that English dress was exactly like Russian dress, because Bogle wore a tunic and square cap that the Lama had been given by 'some Turki Tatars'. Markham adds a footnote calling this 'an instance of the confusion caused by the indiscriminate use of the word Tatar or Tartar'.

the tunic which I wore, and also my cap, the cut of which was four-square instead of being round, had been made a present of to the Lama by some Turki Tatars.

George Bogle (edited by Clements R. Markham, 1876)

About Turki Tatars (Central Asian Turks)

The Torghut flight to China, as told by the Panchen Lama

Editorial contextThe Panchen Lama told Bogle he had been busy with Kalmuk business, and explained that some years before 'a tribe of Tatars' subject to Russia had gone over to China (the Torghut exodus from the Volga in 1771), that the Chinese emperor had imprisoned Russian envoys sent to reclaim them, and that war might follow. It shows news of the steppe travelling through Tibetan religious networks.

He told me that he had been so much engaged with some Kalmuks, and had so much to write on their account, that he had not been able to see me sooner; that several years ago a tribe of Tatars, who were subject to Russia, had gone over to the Chinese

The Panchen (Teshu) Lama, as reported by George Bogle (edited by Markham, 1876)

About Torghut Kalmyks (a tribe of Tatars subject to Russia)

The nameTibet4th to 13th century

Every northern empire was a 'Tatar confederacy'

Editorial contextIn his memorandum Hastings sketches Tibetan history from Chinese sources and calls every northern power a 'Tatar confederacy': the Typa (Tuoba) in the fourth century, the Turks in the eighth and ninth, and on the next page the Mongols under Möngke Khan. It shows 'Tatar' used as a catch-all for any steppe people in the 1770s.

In the fourth century, the Tatar confederacy of the Typa subdued the north and east of Tibet. In the eighth and ninth centuries, when the Tatar confederacy of the Turks became feeble, the power of those nations, which now acknowledge the supremacy of the Dalai Lama, was very great.

Warren Hastings (memorandum on Tibet, 1774)

About Tuoba, Turks and Mongols, all called Tatars

Manning's 'Tatar mandarin' at Lhasa

Editorial contextThomas Manning, travelling to Lhasa in disguise, was dismayed to learn that the chief imperial official there was 'the identical Tatar chieftain' who had been disgraced at Canton over the British occupation of Macao in 1808. Throughout his diary 'the Tatar' means this Manchu amban, whom Manning also calls 'the Tatar dog'.

I had learnt now, to my great sorrow and discomfort, that the chief mandarin at Lhasa was the identical Tatar chieftain who had been disgraced at Canton for his management during the Bengal expedition to Macao. That he was a man of a particular suspicious temper, detested at Lhasa, and that he certainly would give us all the trouble in his power.

Thomas Manning (diary, edited by Markham, 1876)

About Manchu (Qing) officials

Holy relics sold among the Tatar tribes

Editorial contextWarren Hastings's briefing memorandum for Bogle passes on what he had been told about Tibetan Buddhism: each Tatar tribe had its own living Buddha (Kutuktu), all of whom deferred to the Dalai Lama, 'so that his excrements are sold as charms at a great price among all the Tatar tribes of this religion'. It is a startling piece of hearsay from a governor who had never been there.

Among the different Tatar tribes which are of this religion, there are persons called Ku-tchuck-tus, who are likewise esteemed living Fos. … it is even pretended that the Ku-tchuck-tus admit a superiority in the Dalai Lama, so that his excrements are sold as charms at a great price among all the Tatar tribes of this religion.

Warren Hastings (memorandum on Tibet, 1774)

About Mongol ("Tatar") Buddhist tribes

Keep in mind

Hearsay collected in Calcutta; Hastings himself hedges with 'it is even pretended'.

The fine print

How we know

mixed Part firsthand observation, part drawn from other sources.

Two travelers; later documentary anthology

Research notes
  • Two independent observers share one inventory row/edition; editor's nineteenth-century commentary is separate.

Why it matters

Distinct firsthand journeys assembled with supporting historical documents.

Places named

Tibet; Bhutan; Himalayan approaches

Keep exploring