Written source · English

Fletcher's Russe Common Wealth and Horsey's Travels

Two Elizabethan Englishmen on Russia under Ivan the Terrible and his son: an envoy's survey (1591) and a merchant's memoir (1573 to 1591), both full of the Crimean Tartar threat.

Full title Of the Russe Common Wealth and Horsey’s Travels, in Russia at the Close of the Sixteenth Century

Giles Fletcher; Jerome Horsey

Read the 13 passagesOpen the original book

Giles Fletcher (1546-1611), Elizabeth I's envoy to Moscow in 1588-89, published Of the Russe Common Wealth in 1591, a survey of Russian land, government, church and neighbours, including a long chapter on the Tartars. Jerome Horsey (d. 1626) lived in Russia for the Muscovy Company from 1573 to 1591 and later wrote a vivid, self-serving memoir. Fletcher mixes his own observations with Russian hearsay and older books (Herberstein, Laonicus Chalcocondylas, medieval friars). Horsey writes from memory of events he claims to have witnessed. This corpus copy is the Hakluyt Society edition by Edward A. Bond (1856), which prints both texts with Bond's notes.

How they knew
Part eyewitness
Who “Tartar” means here
Mostly the Crimean Tartars ('the Chrim'), whose khan raided Russia yearly and burned Moscow in 1571. Fletcher also uses 'Tartar' for the Nogais, Cheremis (Mari), Mordvins and Circassians, and says the Tartars are the ancient Scythian nomads.
Why read it
Eyewitness English views of the great 1571 burning of Moscow and of Russia's yearly war with the Crimean khanate, with Fletcher's classic portrait of Tartar nomad life and warfare.
Watch out
Fletcher's general Tartar ethnography borrows from much older writers on the 13th-century Mongols (wagon houses, felt idols, horse blood), so it may not describe 16th-century Crimean Tatars, who did have towns. Both authors repeat inflated casualty figures, and Horsey is boastful and prejudiced.

What it says: 13 passages

Moscow burned by the Crimean khan, 1571

Editorial contextFletcher tells how the Crimean khan reached Moscow unopposed in 1571 and fired the suburbs. Because the city was built of wood, the blaze consumed most of it in about four hours, and crowds crushed each other at the gates. He gives the rumoured death toll of 800,000, which is far too high.

(which is all of wood, without any stone, brick, or lime, save certein out roomes) … consumed the greatest part of the citie almost within the space of foure houres, being of thirty miles or more of compasse. Then might you have seene a lamentable spectacle

Giles Fletcher (1591; ed. E. A. Bond, 1856)

About Crimean Tartars under Devlet Giray

Keep in mind

The sentence begins on p.85 ('The citie he tooke not, but fired the suburbs'); only the p.86 part is quoted here, and the OCR of that page is broken by margin notes. The 800,000 dead is hearsay and far too high.

CitiesMoscowMay 1571

Horsey's eyewitness of the great fire

Editorial contextHorsey describes the same disaster: the khan's men fired a church, a storm spread the flames, and the timber city burned in six hours. People drowned in the river with their valuables, and for a year afterwards survivors dredged for jewels. The khan watched from the Simonov monastery.

The enyme fiers St. Johns church high steple : at which instant happened a wounderfull stormye wynd, through which all the churches, howses and palaces, within the cittie and suberbs 30 miells compas, built most of firr and oak tymber, was sett one fier and burnt within six howers space

Sir Jerome Horsey (memoir; ed. E. A. Bond, 1856)

About Crimean Tartars under Devlet Giray

Keep in mind

Horsey arrived in Russia in 1573, two years after the fire, so despite the vivid detail this is what he was told.

CitiesKazan; Astrakhan; Siberia1552-1584 (written c. 1620s)

Kazan, Astrakhan and Siberia conquered

Editorial contextIn his summing up of Ivan the Terrible's reign, Horsey lists the conquest of the Tatar 'kingdoms' of Kazan and Astrakhan and the peoples along the Volga to the Caspian, the end of tribute to the Crimean khan, and the conquest of the 'kingdom of Siberia'.

he conquered the kingdom of Casan and the kingdom of Astracan, and all the regions and great people of the Nagaie and Chercas Tartors, and many other of that kinde, inhabitinge above two thowsand miells of each side that famous river of Volga, sowthward eaven to the Mare Caspian Sea.

Sir Jerome Horsey (memoir; ed. E. A. Bond, 1856)

About Kazan, Astrakhan, Nogai and Circassian Tartars

Keep in mind

Horsey overstates: the Nogais and Circassians were never fully conquered in Ivan's lifetime.

No towns, only houses on wheels

Editorial contextFletcher says the Tartars build no towns or standing buildings. They live in wheeled 'walking houses' which they park in rows to form streets and the shape of a town, and even the khan's capital is a moving 'town of wood'. They reportedly think fixed buildings unhealthy.

Townes they plant none, nor other standing buildings, but have walking houses, which the Latines call veii, built upon wheeles like a shepheards cottage. … And when they come to their stage or standing place, they plant their cart houses very orderly in a ranke ; and so make the forme of streetes and of a large towne.

Giles Fletcher (1591; ed. E. A. Bond, 1856)

About Crimean and Nogai Tartars (Fletcher's general 'Tartar')

Keep in mind

This echoes medieval accounts of the 13th-century Mongols; the Crimean khans of Fletcher's day actually ruled from the town of Bakhchysarai, which Fletcher never visited.

Show 9 more passages

Olla Billa: the Tartar war cry

Editorial contextFletcher describes Tartar raiders setting dummy riders on spare horses to look more numerous, and charging with the cry 'Olla Billa' (Allah, bi-llah), which he translates 'God help us'. He contrasts their refusal to surrender with the behaviour of Russian and Turkish soldiers.

When they make any onset their manner is to make a great shoote, crying all out together, Olla Billa, Olla Billa, God helpe us, God helpe us. They contemne death so much as that they chuse rather to die then to yeeld to their enimie, and are seene when they are slaine to bite the very weapon

Giles Fletcher (1591; ed. E. A. Bond, 1856)

About Crimean Tartars

Pigs as a border defence

Editorial contextRussian borderers, Fletcher says, kept almost nothing but pigs, because Muslim Tartar raiders would not touch or drive them off. He also notes that the Crimean khan was now largely picked by the Ottoman sultan and paid him a tenth of his war booty.

The Russe borders (being used to their invasions lightly every yeere in the sommer) keepe fewe other cattel on the border parts save swine onely, which the Tartar will not touch nor drive away with him ; for that he is of the Turkish religion, and will eate no swines flesh.

Giles Fletcher (1591; ed. E. A. Bond, 1856)

About Crimean Tartars

Two horses each: one to ride, one to eat

Editorial contextTartar soldiers, says Fletcher, bring two horses, one to ride and one to eat, and horseflesh is their main food. He adds something he saw himself: when the Crimean prince Kiriach Murza came to Moscow with 300 Tartars, he was welcomed with two fat horses, ready skinned, for supper.

every man with his two horse at the least, the one to ride on, the other to kill, when it commeth to his turne to have his horse eate. For their chiefe vittaile is horse flesh, which they eate without bread or any other thing with it.

Giles Fletcher (1591; ed. E. A. Bond, 1856)

About Crimean Tartars

Keep in mind

The general claim is hearsay; the Moscow banquet for Kiriach Murza is what Fletcher himself witnessed.

Felt idols on the doors of their wagons

Editorial contextFletcher says that, unlike Turks, Tartars keep silk or cloth human figures fastened to the doors of their 'walking houses' as house guardians, made by religious women, and bow to a huge image of their khan when the army marches. He also calls them much given to witchcraft and omens.

Herein they differ from the Turkish religion, for that they have certeine idole puppets, made of silke or like stuffe, of the fashion of a man, which they fasten to the doore of their walking houses, to be as Janusses or keepers of their house. And these idols are made not by all, but by certeine religious women

Giles Fletcher (1591; ed. E. A. Bond, 1856)

About Crimean Tartars (as described by Fletcher)

Keep in mind

This closely follows 13th-century friars' descriptions of pagan Mongols; the Muslim Crimean Tatars of 1590 are unlikely to have kept such idols.

Three hundred Tartars drowned in a forced baptism

Editorial contextFletcher reports that Russians offered captured Tartars their lives if they accepted baptism, but few agreed. The year after the 1571 fire, a captured Tartar noble and 300 of his men refused, and were 'baptized' by being knocked on the head and thrust into the river.

The yere after Mosko was fired by the Chrim Tartar, there was taken a Dwoymorsey, one of the chiefe in that exploit, with 300 Tartars more : who had all their lives offered them, if they would be baptized after the Russe manner. Which they refused all to doo … they were all baptized after a violent manner, being thrust downe with a knock on the head into the water.

Giles Fletcher (1591; ed. E. A. Bond, 1856)

About Crimean Tartar prisoners

The Tartars are the old Scythian shepherds

Editorial contextAfter a harsh description of Tartar looks and singing, Fletcher identifies the Tartars with the 'Scythian nomads' of Greek and Latin writers. Following the Byzantine historian Laonicus Chalcocondylas, he adds that the Turks may have sprung from the Crimean Tartars, since 'Turk' was said to mean shepherd.

They are the very same that sometimes were called Scythae Nomades, or the Scythian shepheards, by the Greekes and Latines. Some thinke that the Turkes tooke their beginning from the nation of the Chrim Tartars.

Giles Fletcher (1591; ed. E. A. Bond, 1856)

About Tartars in general; Crimean Tartars

Keep in mind

A bookish identification drawn from classical and Byzantine writers.

Nogais, Cheremis, Mordvins and 'Chircasses': other 'Tartars'

Editorial contextFletcher files several quite different peoples under 'Tartar': the Nogais (the best warriors, but the most savage), the Cheremis (actually the Finnic-speaking Mari), the Mordvins (also Finnic) and the 'Chircasses'. He says they differ more in name than in way of life, except the Chircasses, who border south-west towards Lithuania, follow Polish fashions, are far more 'civil', and are partly subject to the king of Poland and Christian. That description fits the Dnieper Cossacks, whom Russians called Cherkasy, better than the Circassians of the Caucasus.

There are divers other Tartars that border upon Russia, as the Nagais [Nogais], the Cheremissens, the Mordwites, the Chircasses, and the Shalcans, which all differ in name more then in regiment or other condition from the Chrim Tartar, except the Chircasses

Giles Fletcher (1591; ed. E. A. Bond, 1856; bracketed words are Bond's)

About Nogai, Cheremis (Mari), Mordvins, 'Chircasses' (probably the Dnieper Cossacks, Russian Cherkasy)

Keep in mind

A good example of 'Tartar' as a catch-all: the Mari and Mordvins are not Turkic peoples at all, and the Christian 'Chircasses' near Lithuania were probably Cossacks.

Strange talesMoscow (Kremlin)reported 1588-1591 (about the 15th century)

The Tsar feeding the khan's horse from his cap

Editorial contextFletcher says the Crimean khan claimed Moscow itself as his right, and repeats a Russian story that the Russian ruler once had to stand on foot and feed the khan's horse with oats from his own cap as yearly homage. On the next page he says this homage was later turned into a tribute of furs.

that tell of a certeine homage that was done by the Russe emperour every yeare to the Great Chrim or Cham, the Russe emperour standing on foot and feeding the Chrims horse (himselfe sitting on his back) with oates out of his owne cap, in stead of a boule or maunger

Giles Fletcher (1591; ed. E. A. Bond, 1856)

About Crimean khan and Russian rulers

Keep in mind

A story Fletcher gives 'by the report of the Russes themselves'. Margin notes break the OCR of this passage and have been removed; check the page image.

'Away with those new devils and their thundering puffs'

Editorial contextHorsey claims he persuaded Ivan IV to arm captured Scottish mercenaries and send them against the Crimean Tartars. Twelve hundred Scots with guns, he boasts, did better than 12,000 Russian archers, and the Tartars, unused to firearms, fled crying out against the 'new devils'.

Twelve hundred of them did better service against the Tartor then 12 thowsand Russes, with their shortte bowe and arowes. The Crim, not knowinge then the use of peece and pistolls, stroken dead of their horses with shott they sawe not, cried : " Awaye with those new divells that com with their thunderinge puffs ;"

Sir Jerome Horsey (memoir; ed. E. A. Bond, 1856)

About Crimean Tartars

Keep in mind

A boastful anecdote; the Crimean khanate had firearms and Ottoman gunners by this time.

The fine print

How we know

mixed Part firsthand observation, part drawn from other sources.

Envoy and resident; documentary anthology

Research notes
  • Two authors in one edited volume (Edward A. Bond, 1856); don't conflate their testimony.

Why it matters

Contemporary accounts of Russian government and neighboring peoples.

Places named

Muscovy; Volga; Tatar relations

Keep exploring