Written source · English

Jonas Hanway's history of British trade over the Caspian

An English merchant's own journey down the Volga to Persia in 1743 to 1745, bundled with other travellers' journals to Khiva, Bukhara and Derbent.

Full title An Historical Account of the British Trade over the Caspian Sea

Jonas Hanway

Read the 17 passagesOpen the original book

Jonas Hanway (1712-1786), a London merchant of the Russia Company, travelled in 1743 to 1745 from St Petersburg down the Volga to Astrakhan and across the Caspian to Persia, trying to open a silk trade, and was robbed in a rebellion at Astrabad. His 1753 book mixes his own journal with a history of the trade, a life of Nadir Shah, and journals by others: Captain Woodroofe (Moscow to Kazan, 1740), the factors Reynold Hogg and George Thompson (Kazakh steppe, Khiva and Bukhara, 1740 to 1741), and the Russian embassy to Persia of 1746 (Astrakhan to Derbent and Shirvan). This corpus copy is the 1753 London edition, volumes 1 and 2 in one scan.

How they knew
Part eyewitness
Who “Tartar” means here
A broad label for the Muslim and nomadic peoples around the Volga and Caspian: Kalmyks, Nogais, settled Tatars of Crimean descent near Astrakhan, Kazakhs ('Kirgeese'), Turkmens, Uzbeks of Khiva and Bukhara, Kumyks and Lezgins of Dagestan, and even the Cossacks.
Why read it
Vivid scenes of Kalmyk tents, Tatar graves and marriage signals near Astrakhan, and rare British eyewitness pictures of Khiva, Bukhara and the ruins of Urgench.
Watch out
Keep apart Hanway's own travels (Volga, Astrakhan, Persia) and the journals he reprints from others, and the compiled histories. He is quick to call Tartars treacherous. The OCR of this Indian-library scan is rough and has no printed page numbers.

What it says: 17 passages

The ruined city of Urgench and its gold

Editorial contextOn the way to Khiva the factors passed the old city they call 'Jurgantz' (Urgench), once large but now all in ruins except a mosque. Their Tartar companions prayed there and then went looking for gold that, they said, rains often washed out of the ruins. Urgench had been the great capital of Khwarazm destroyed by the Mongols in 1221 and again by Tamerlane.

…we came to the city Jurgantz, which appeared to have been a large place; but now was entirely in ruins, no other building remaining than a mosque. Here our company were very devout: they offered their prayers to heaven for their safe journey, and then went in search of gold, which they said, they had frequently found washed out by the rains from amongst the ruins of this city.

British factors Reynold Hogg and George Thompson, their 1740 journal as printed by Jonas Hanway (1753)

About Kazakh and Turkmen caravan men ('Tartars')

Astrakhan, city of a Tartar founder

Editorial contextHanway gives the history as he heard it: Astrakhan was named after a Tartar founder, Hadgee Terkan, was ruled by Tartars for ages and taken by Ivan the Terrible in 1554. In his day it had some 70,000 people, including many Armenians and 'Tartars of various denominations', an 'epitome of Asia'. The old brick wall was ruinous and the houses mostly mean wooden ones.

…and derives its name from Hadgee Terkan a Tartar by whom it was founded. It was for many ages subject to the Tartars, from whom it was taken by Ivan Wassilowitz czar of Muscovy in 1554, … It contains about 70,000 inhabitants, among whom are many Armenians and Tartars of various denominations, with a few Persians and Indians.

Jonas Hanway (Historical Account, 1753)

About Tartars of Astrakhan (the former khanate)

Keep in mind

The founder story (Hadji Tarkhan) is a traditional etymology repeated by Hanway.

A Tartar town with whitewashed clay walls

Editorial contextThe Russian embassy of 1746 passed a Tartar town under Russian protection, ruled by a prince called Alt Sheff, on a high river bank on the road north of Derbent. It had about 300 houses with clay walls whitened with lime. The diarist grumbles that its people were the most skilful thieves in the world.

…arrived at a tartar town under the Russian protection; though otherwise a kind of independent state. The prince of it was called Alt Sheff: it stands on a high bank on the north side of the river …, and contains about 300 houses; the walls of which are of clay whitened with lime. The inhabitants are the most acute thieves in the world,

Anonymous journal of the Russian embassy to Persia of 1746, extract printed by Jonas Hanway (1753)

About Tartars of northern Dagestan (probably Kumyks)

Kalmyk fishing camps of felt tents

Editorial contextSailing down the Volga to the Caspian, Hanway slept within pistol-shot of a Kalmyk settlement and describes their round tents (kibitkas) of canes covered with thick camel-hair felt, with the fire in the middle and the smoke going out at the top. These were poor Kalmyks living by fishing, seven or eight tents together under a chosen chief; others migrated south for the winter.

At night we slept within pistol-shot of a Khalmuck settlement. The habitations of these people are round tents, which they call khabitka's, raised with canes in the form of a cone, and covered with wilocks. These tents are of 10, and some of 15 yards in circumference, and about 12 feet high; they make their fires in the center of the tent,

Jonas Hanway (Historical Account, 1753)

About Kalmyk Tartars

Show 13 more passages

Brick-lined graves of the Astrakhan Tatars

Editorial contextAround Astrakhan Hanway found settled farmers 'of the race of the Crim Tartars', tributary to Russia. He contrasts their burial with the Kalmyks': they dig deep graves, line them with sun-dried bricks and whitewash them, build a cover over them, and raise mud walls around the tomb topped with white flags. The same page describes their marriage custom of the white tent (see below).

They dig their graves very deep, and after lining them with bricks dried in the sun, and whitewashing them in the inside, they build a cover over them. They also raise thick walls of mud round each tomb, on the top of which are fixed one or more white flags, according to the character of the deceased.

Jonas Hanway (Historical Account, 1753)

About Tatars of Crimean descent settled around Astrakhan

Khiva: walls of earth and houses of mud

Editorial contextThe British factors Hogg and Thompson reached Khiva in 1740. They describe it as the khan's seat on rising ground, defended by a very thick earth wall higher than the houses, with turrets and a wet ditch. The houses are low, mostly mud-built, with flat roofs covered in earth. On the same page they note that the Khivans live in towns while their Kazakh neighbours live in tents.

It is situated on a rising ground, has three gates, and is defended by a strong wall of earth, very thick, and much higher than the houses: it has turrets at small distances, and a broad deep ditch full of water. The place is large, but the houses are low, the greatest part of them being built with mud; the roofs are flat, and covered with earth.

British factors Reynold Hogg and George Thompson, their 1740 journal as printed by Jonas Hanway (1753)

About Khivan Tartars (Uzbeks)

Bukhara's brick mosques and ruined bazaars

Editorial contextGeorge Thompson went on alone to Bukhara. He describes low mud houses inside a slender earth wall, but caravanserais and many mosques of brick, and a college for priests of brick and stone. The bazaars had been 'stately buildings' but were now mostly in ruins. He adds a lurid note about guinea worms ('rishtas') from the bad water.

…the houses are low, and mostly built of mud: but the caravanserais and the mosques, which are numerous, are all of brick: the bazars, or market-places, have been stately buildings, but are now the greatest part of them in ruins; these are generally built of brick and stone.

British factors Reynold Hogg and George Thompson, their 1740 journal as printed by Jonas Hanway (1753)

About Bukharans and Uzbek Tartars

A white tent for a daughter who may marry

Editorial contextWhen a daughter of these settled Tatar farmers was ready to marry, her family covered her tent with white linen tied with red strings and set a painted cloth on top, with a painted wagon beside it as her dowry. Suitors took the hint, and the girl generally went to the man who offered her father the best present.

When any of their daughters become marriageable, they cover her tent with white linen, and put a painted cloth on the top, which is usually tied with red strings: they have also a painted waggon on the side of the tent; and this is to be her marriage portion. Those who design to marry observe this signal,

Jonas Hanway (Historical Account, 1753)

About Tatars of Crimean descent settled around Astrakhan

Honoured by the number of dogs

Editorial contextHanway reports that the Kalmyks threw their dead into open fields for dogs to eat, and that a body eaten by more than six dogs did honour to the dead. He also describes their small wooden idols dressed in rags, caressed in good seasons and beaten in bad ones. Near Astrakhan he later saw many human skulls lying on the steppe, 'for the Khalmucks always leave their dead uninterred'.

They throw their dead into open fields, to be devoured by dogs; of which many run wild, and some are kept for this purpose. If their bodies are thus devoured by any number exceeding six, they think honourably of the state of the deceased; otherwise he is a disgrace to his relations.

Jonas Hanway (Historical Account, 1753)

About Kalmyk Tartars

Keep in mind

Partly hearsay; Hanway admits he could not talk with them and judges only 'the externals of a religion'.

Kumiss in the tent of a Kazakh chief

Editorial contextTravelling in Tartar dress with Kazakh guides, the factors reached the horde of the chief Jean Beek (Janibek Batyr). He sat on a carpet in his tent, rose to welcome them, drank a large dish of kumiss and made them drink too. The next page describes Kazakh felt tents, horse meat, drunkenness on fermented mare's milk, the dried cheese called 'crute', and their rule of never harming a guest while he is under protection.

This Tartar-chief was sitting on a carpet in his tent; he rose, and bid us welcome, and making us sit down with him, he took a large dish of kumees, which he drank, and made us do the same. We gave him some small presents, which he immediately divided amongst the company.

British factors Reynold Hogg and George Thompson, their 1740 journal as printed by Jonas Hanway (1753)

About Kazakh ('Kirgeese') Tartars of the Lesser Horde

No images in the mosque

Editorial contextAfter visiting the Indian temple at Astrakhan, Hanway contrasts the Muslim Tatars, who abhor image worship so much that they will not carry coins stamped with a man, bird or beast into their temples. Their worship is silent prostration, with the priest calling on the lord of nature through Muhammad. He adds that the Nogais are Muslims who look like the Kalmyks 'but better favoured'.

The Tartars hold this image worship in the utmost abomination; they will not carry even money which has any impression of man, bird, beast, creeping thing, or insect, into their temples. Their devotion is in silence and prostrations,

Jonas Hanway (Historical Account, 1753)

About Muslim Tatars of Astrakhan

Where the Chuvash smear fat on the shrine

Editorial contextCaptain Woodroofe's journal calls the Chuvash 'the poorest and most wretched of all mortals', tributary to Russia and heavily taxed. He could not learn their beliefs, but saw that they stick part of their food over doors and windows, and that when they kill an animal the priest eats some of the fat, greases himself and smears their place of worship with it. He adds that the neighbouring Tartars eat horse meat.

We could not discover what notions the chuvashins have of religion, but observed when they dress victuals, they stick part of it over their doors and windows; and when they kill an animal, … their priest takes out the fat, and after eating some of it and greasing himself, he smears over their place of worship,

Captain Thomas Woodroofe, his 1740 journal as printed by Jonas Hanway (1753)

About Chuvash ('Chuvashin Tartars')

The nameDon RiverOctober 1743

'The Cossacks are a species of Tartars'

Editorial contextPassing through Cossack villages on the Khoper, Hanway describes clean, well-dressed people and women with crescent-shaped caps. He then files the Cossacks under 'Tartars', explaining that their name means freebooters. It shows how loosely an eighteenth-century Englishman used 'Tartar' for any steppe people on Russia's frontier, even Orthodox Russians.

The Cossacks are a species of tartars: their name signifies free-booters; but in these parts they are civilized, and faithful to the Russian government,

Jonas Hanway (Historical Account, 1753)

About Don Cossacks

Kuban means wild hog

Editorial contextWoodroofe says the Chuvash were descended from the Kuban Tartars and explains that 'Kooban' means a wild hog in Russian, a name given for their fierce nature, because Ivan the Terrible found them harder to subdue than the Crimean or Nogai Tartars. It is a folk etymology (the Kuban is a river), but a vivid example of how names for Tartar groups were explained.

Kooban, in the Russian language signifies a wild hog; which name was given to these Tartars on account of their fierce and savage nature, having cost Ivan Wassilowitz more trouble to subdue them,

Captain Thomas Woodroofe, his 1740 journal as printed by Jonas Hanway (1753)

About Chuvash and Kuban Tartars

Keep in mind

A folk etymology: the Kuban Tatars were named after the Kuban river, and the Chuvash are not descended from them.

Forty Christian Tartar princes buried at Derbent

Editorial contextOn the hills around Derbent the 1746 embassy saw many ancient graves and tombstones six to nine feet long, with inscriptions no one could read. Persians told them forty of these belonged to Christian Tartar princes who died for their faith, and that each stone was cut to the exact height of the dead man. The diarist warns that the Persians 'deal much in the marvellous'. (These are probably the Kirkhlyar, the 'Forty' cemetery linked to the early Arab conquest.)

…the Persians report, that of these are not less than 40 belonging to Christian Tartar princes, who have died fighting for their religion. There are many antient tomb-stones, from 6 to 9 feet long, … with inscriptions not intelligible to any of the present inhabitants. The Persians, who deal much in the marvellous, endeavoured to persuade us, that these stones were cut in length exactly to the stature of the deceased

Anonymous journal of the Russian embassy to Persia of 1746, extract printed by Jonas Hanway (1753)

About 'Christian Tartar' princes (Persian tradition)

Keep in mind

Local Persian tradition, which the diarist himself doubts. The identification with the Kirkhlyar cemetery is ours, not the source's.

A tower of 282 heads

Editorial contextMarching from Shamakhi towards the Kura, the embassy passed a circular 'pyramid' about fifty feet high with niches holding the heads of 282 Persian and Tartar chiefs of the Shamakhi rebellion, all beheaded in one morning on Nadir Shah's orders. The diarist notes that these Tartars had never accepted Persian rule, yet were punished as rebels.

…here is a circular pyramid of near 50 feet high; in which are niches filled with 282 human heads, of the late Persian and tartar chiefs of the Shamakie rebellion, who were all beheaded in one morning. These Tartars had not acknowledged subjection to Persia, and yet they were treated as rebels.

Anonymous journal of the Russian embassy to Persia of 1746, extract printed by Jonas Hanway (1753)

About Persian and Tartar rebel chiefs

Skulls without sutures on the Kalmyk steppe

Editorial contextRiding back from Astrakhan, Hanway saw many human skulls lying about, as if on a battlefield, because the Kalmyks leave their dead unburied. He examined several and claims he could find no sutures in them. A footnote adds that surgeons doubted any race lacked sutures. A small, odd moment of amateur anatomy on the steppe.

I observed here many human sculls, as if the place had been a field of battle; for the Khalmucks always leave their dead uninterred. Upon examining several of these sculls, I could not discover any sutures,

Jonas Hanway (Historical Account, 1753)

About Kalmyk Tartars

Keep in mind

Hanway's anatomical claim is his own impression; his footnote records that surgeons doubted it.

The fine print

How we know

mixed Part firsthand observation, part drawn from other sources.

Merchant traveler; historical compiler

Research notes
  • Verified scan is volumes I–II; distinguish travel narrative from assembled histories.

Why it matters

Trade routes, cities, warfare and conditions around the Caspian.

Places named

Caspian; Persia; southern Russia

Keep exploring